Literature DB >> 15976365

Cathodal current-induced vasodilation to single application and the amplified response to repeated application in humans rely on aspirin-sensitive mechanisms.

M Tartas1, P Bouyé, A Koïtka, V Jaquinandi, L Tan, J L Saumet, P Abraham.   

Abstract

Assumed to rely on an axon reflex, the current-induced vasodilation (CIV) interferes with the microvascular response to iontophoretic drug delivery. Mechanisms resulting in CIV are likely different at the anode and at the cathode. While studies have been conducted to understand anodal CIV, little information is available on cathodal CIV. The present study investigates CIV observed following 0.1-mA cathodal applications on forearms of healthy volunteers and the possible mechanisms involved. Results are expressed in percentage of the cutaneous heat-induced maximal vascular conductance [%MVC (means +/- SE)]. 1) The amplitude of CIV was proportional to the duration of cathodal currents for periods of <1 min: r = 0.99. 2) Two current applications of 10 s, with 10-min interstimulation interval, induced a higher peak value of CIV (79.1 +/- 8.6% MVC) than the one obtained with all-at-once 20-s current application (39.5 +/- 4.3% MVC, P < 0.05). This amplified vascular response due to segmental application was observed for all tested interstimulation intervals (up to 40 min). 3) Two hours and 3 days following pretreatment with 1-g oral aspirin, the CIV observed following cathodal application, as well as the difference of cathodal CIV amplitude between all-at-once and segmented applications, were reduced. These findings suggest a role of prostaglandins, not only released from endothelial or smooth muscle cells, as direct vasodilator and/or as a sensitizer. Thus aspirin pretreatment could be used to decrease CIV resulting from all-at-once and repeated cathodal application and facilitate the study of the specific vascular effect induced by the drug delivered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15976365     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00258.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  5 in total

1.  Evidence for a vasomotor cyclo-oxygenase dependent mechanism of sensitization at the cutaneous level.

Authors:  G Mahé; P Abraham; A Humeau-Heurtier; L Gascoin; G Lefthériotis; S Durand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Repeated cycles of electrical stimulation decrease vasoconstriction and axon-reflex vasodilation to noradrenaline in the human forearm.

Authors:  Peter D Drummond
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Analgesia to pressure-pain develops in the ipsilateral forehead after high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation of the forearm.

Authors:  Lechi Vo; Peter D Drummond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction.

Authors:  Mark Brinton; Yossi Mandel; Ira Schachar; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Historical reviews of the assessment of human cardiovascular function: interrogation and understanding of the control of skin blood flow.

Authors:  David A Low; Helen Jones; N Tim Cable; Lacy M Alexander; W Larry Kenney
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.