Literature DB >> 24276314

Analgesia to pressure-pain develops in the ipsilateral forehead after high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation of the forearm.

Lechi Vo1, Peter D Drummond.   

Abstract

In healthy participants, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the forearm not only evokes local hyperalgesia but also inhibits sensitivity to pressure-pain in the ipsilateral forehead, possibly due to activation of ipsilateral inhibitory pain modulation processes. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation of the forearm on sensitivity to pressure-pain in the ipsilateral forehead, as inhibitory pain modulation may be stronger after low- than high-frequency electrical stimulation. Before and after high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation, sensitivity to heat and to blunt and sharp stimuli was assessed at and adjacent to the electrically conditioned site in the forearm. In addition, sensitivity to blunt pressure was measured bilaterally in the forehead. Pain was more intense after high- than low-frequency electrical stimulation and was followed by primary and secondary hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation after high- but not low-frequency electrical stimulation. Nevertheless, sensitivity to pressure-pain decreased to the same extent in the ipsilateral forehead after both forms of electrical stimulation. This decrease was associated with heightened sensitivity to pressure-pain at the electrically conditioned forearm site and with diminished sensitivity to heat around this site. These findings suggest that sensitisation of pressure-sensitive nociceptive afferents at the site of electrical stimulation is associated with generation of an ipsilateral pain-inhibitory process. This ipsilateral pain-inhibitory process may decrease sensitivity to pressure-pain in the ipsilateral forehead and suppress secondary hyperalgesia to heat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24276314     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3776-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Electrical low-frequency stimulation induces central neuroplastic changes of pain processing in man.

Authors:  K Jung; D Lelic; S Rottmann; A M Drewes; L Petrini; J Ellrich
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  Bilateral lesions in the area of the nucleus locus coeruleus affect the development of hyperalgesia during carrageenan-induced inflammation.

Authors:  M Tsuruoka; W D Willis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-07-08       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Analysis of hyperalgesia time courses in humans after painful electrical high-frequency stimulation identifies a possible transition from early to late LTP-like pain plasticity.

Authors:  Doreen B Pfau; Thomas Klein; Daniel Putzer; Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Walter Magerl
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Differential inhibitory effect on human nociceptive skin senses induced by local stimulation of thin cutaneous fibers.

Authors:  H J Nilsson; J Schouenborg
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Cold-induced limb pain decreases sensitivity to pressure-pain sensations in the ipsilateral forehead.

Authors:  Lone Knudsen; Peter D Drummond
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  The role of heterosynaptic facilitation in long-term potentiation (LTP) of human pain sensation.

Authors:  Thomas Klein; Simon Stahn; Walter Magerl; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Perceptual correlates of nociceptive long-term potentiation and long-term depression in humans.

Authors:  Thomas Klein; Walter Magerl; Hanns-Christian Hopf; Jürgen Sandkühler; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Differential endogenous pain modulation in complex-regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Frank Seifert; Georg Kiefer; Roberto DeCol; Martin Schmelz; Christian Maihöfner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter of the rat produces a preferential ipsilateral antinociception.

Authors:  R Levine; M M Morgan; J T Cannon; J C Liebeskind
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Neural correlates of heterotopic facilitation induced after high frequency electrical stimulation of nociceptive pathways.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke; Casper H van Heck; Clementina M van Rijn; Oliver Hg Wilder-Smith
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.395

View more
  4 in total

1.  Burst-like conditioning electrical stimulation is more efficacious than continuous stimulation for inducing secondary hyperalgesia in humans.

Authors:  S Gousset; A Mouraux; E N van den Broeke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intensity-dependent modulation of cortical somatosensory processing during external, low-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Danielle Hewitt; Alice Newton-Fenner; Jessica Henderson; Nicholas B Fallon; Christopher Brown; Andrej Stancak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Painful stimulation of a sensitized site in the forearm inhibits ipsilateral trigeminal nociceptive blink reflexes.

Authors:  Peter D Drummond; Ashlea Bell; Lechi Vo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  No evidence of widespread mechanical pressure hyperalgesia after experimentally induced central sensitization through skin nociceptors.

Authors:  Timothée Cayrol; Laurent Pitance; Nathalie Roussel; André Mouraux; Emanuel N van den Broeke
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.