Literature DB >> 1597610

Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes.

M Abella1, J Formolo, D G Penney.   

Abstract

This study evaluated stethoscope acoustics by using a sound frequency generator and an active artificial ear. Six popular, currently available stethoscopes were compared in their various modes involving bells, diaphragms, etc.: Littmann Classic II, Littmann Cardiology II, Littmann Master Cardiology, Hewlett-Packard Rappaport-Sprague, Tycos Harvey Triple Head, and Allen Medical Series 5A RPS Binaural. The transfer function was measured from 37.5-1000 Hz, the range where nearly all heart and lung sounds are found. Sound in the low-frequency range (37.5-112.5 Hz) was in most cases amplified by the bells and attenuated by the diaphragms; however, there were no significant differences. Both bells and diaphragms attenuated sound transmission in the high range, and this increased with frequency. The Tycos Harvey Triple Head ribbed diaphragm attenuated sound transmission to a significantly greater extent than the other diaphragms (P less than 0.01). The results show that the bell and diaphragm for a given stethoscope usually have different transmission characteristics, particularly at low frequencies. The Littmann Classic II is an exception. The Hewlett-Packard and Tycos Harvey stethoscopes showed the greatest differences in low frequency response between the bell and the diaphragm. While the differences found in sound transmission between stethoscopes were in most cases small, the Littmann Cardiology II, bell and diaphragm, appears to possess the best overall performance by this study design.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597610     DOI: 10.1121/1.403655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  The stethoscope: some preliminary investigations.

Authors:  P D Welsby; G Parry; D Smith
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Investigating a compact phantom and setup for testing body sound transducers.

Authors:  Hansen A Mansy; Joshua Grahe; Thomas J Royston; Richard H Sandler
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Using cervical auscultation in the clinical dysphagia examination in long-term care.

Authors:  P M Zenner; D S Losinski; R H Mills
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Stethoscope acoustics and cervical auscultation of swallowing.

Authors:  S Hamlet; D G Penney; J Formolo
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.

Authors:  Valerie Rennoll; Ian McLane; Dimitra Emmanouilidou; James West; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 6.  Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis.

Authors:  Adam Rao; Emily Huynh; Thomas J Royston; Aaron Kornblith; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Comparing the auscultatory accuracy of health care professionals using three different brands of stethoscopes on a simulator.

Authors:  Mansoor Mehmood; Hazem L Abu Grara; Joshua S Stewart; Faisal A Khasawneh
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-08-14

8.  Validation of an effective, low cost, Free/open access 3D-printed stethoscope.

Authors:  Alexander Pavlosky; Jennifer Glauche; Spencer Chambers; Mahmoud Al-Alawi; Kliment Yanev; Tarek Loubani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An open real-time tele-stethoscopy system.

Authors:  Ignacio Foche-Perez; Rodolfo Ramirez-Payba; German Hirigoyen-Emparanza; Fernando Balducci-Gonzalez; Francisco-Javier Simo-Reigadas; Joaquin Seoane-Pascual; Jaime Corral-Peñafiel; Andres Martinez-Fernandez
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Comparison of stethoscope bell and diaphragm, and of stethoscope tube length, for clinical blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Chengyu Liu; Clive Griffiths; Alan Murray; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.