Literature DB >> 1597605

Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.

A Faulkner1, V Ball, S Rosen, B C Moore, A Fourcin.   

Abstract

A family of prototype speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired has been compared to amplification. These aids are designed to extract acoustic speech patterns that convey essential phonetic contrasts, and to match this information to residual receptive abilities. In the first study, the presentation of voice fundamental frequency information from a wearable SiVo (sinusoidal voice) aid was compared to amplification in 11 profoundly deafened adults. Intonation reception was often better, and never worse, with fundamental frequency information. Four subjects scored more highly in audio-visual consonant identification with fundamental frequency information, five performed better with amplified speech, and two performed similarly under these two conditions. Five of the 11 subjects continued use of the SiVo aid after the tests were complete. A second study examined a laboratory prototype compound speech pattern aid, which encoded voice fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and the presence of voiceless excitation. In five profoundly deafened adults, performance was better in consonant identification when additional speech patterns were present than with fundamental frequency alone; the main advantage was derived from amplitude information. In both consonant identification and connected discourse tracking, performance with appropriately matched compound speech pattern signals was better than with amplified speech in three subjects, and similar to performance with amplified speech in the other two. In nine subjects, frequency discrimination, gap detection, and frequency selectivity were measured, and were compared to speech receptive abilities with both amplification and fundamental frequency presentation. The subjects who showed the greatest advantage from fundamental frequency presentation showed the greatest average hearing losses, and the least degree of frequency selectivity. Compound speech pattern aids appear to be more effective for some profoundly hearing-impaired listeners than conventional amplifying aids, and may be a valuable alternative to cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597605     DOI: 10.1121/1.403674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Nicole M Scherrer; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

3.  Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory System Development and Dysfunction: What Do We Really Know about Childhood Hearing Loss?

Authors:  A E Carney
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

5.  Benefits of preserving stationary and time-varying formant structure in alternative representations of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Taylor Wucinich; Eric Tarr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Sean R Mills; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.