Literature DB >> 15974858

Osseointegrated dental implants in private practice: a long-term case series study.

Keith J Lemmerman1, Neal E Lemmerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osseointegrated dental implants have become a routinely recommended procedure in the clinical practice of dentistry and periodontics. Due to their predictability, they have changed the way many cases are treatment planned. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a prospective study of factors affecting the successes and failures of a large group of dental implants and compare them to published literature.
METHODS: A total of 1,003 consecutively placed pure titanium dental implants placed from August 1987 to January 2002 and followed to October 2003 are reported. All implants were placed in one private practice by the same surgeon.
RESULTS: Success rates statistically were influenced only by the age of the implant, although when the raw data are examined, some trends are seen. Success was unaffected by patient age, gender, surface roughness of implant, site of placement, smoking, bone type, arch, screw versus press-fit, diameter, length, manufacturer, reason for tooth loss, site bony augmentation and timing, placement timing, one-versus two-stage placement, or torque testing of implants; 75% of failures occurred before restoration.
CONCLUSIONS: Osseointegrated dental implants are a highly predictable procedure with proper case selection. Failure rates vary for a number of factors reviewed, although only the age of the implant was statistically important in predicting failure. Male smokers, maxillary first molars, and type 4 bone had increased failure rates. Threaded, surface-roughened implants had the highest success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15974858     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  8 in total

1.  Full-arch maxillary rehabilitation fixed on 6 implants.

Authors:  M Gargari; V Prete; A Pujia; F M Ceruso
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-07-15

Review 2.  Relationship between oral cancer and implants: clinical cases and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Enrique Jané-Salas; José López-López; Xavier Roselló-Llabrés; Oscar-Francisco Rodríguez-Argueta; Eduardo Chimenos-Küstner
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  Comparative Study of the Early Loading of Resorbable Blasting Media and Sandblasting with Large-grit and Acid-etching Surface Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sung-Beom Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Byung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-11-12

4.  The Effect of Smoking Behavior on Alveolar Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Clinical Implant Patient.

Authors:  Xicong Zhao; Bin Zhu; Yan Duan; Xin Wang; Dehua Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Correlation between bone mineral density of jaws and skeletal sites in an Iranian population using dual X-ray energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  Nasrin Esfahanizadeh; Sotoudeh Davaie; A R Rokn; Hamid Reza Daneshparvar; Noushin Bayat; Nasrin Khondi; Sara Ajvadi; Mostafa Ghandi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-07

6.  Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Jorge Noriega; Carmen Castro; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

7.  Restoring a post-traumatic partial edentulous mandible with the Toronto prosthesis: a clinical report.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nematollahi; Marzieh Alikhasi; Elaheh Beyabanaki
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2018-06-20

8.  Prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis after at least 7 years of loading.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Ahn; Hyun-Joo Kim; Ji-Young Joo; Ju-Youn Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.614

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.