OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to review radiofrequency ablation of 100 renal tumors and lessons learned with respect to electrode approach, effects on collecting system, bowel proximity, and patterns of residual disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 6 years, 100 renal tumors in 85 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation. Images were reviewed to determine the following: effect of initial electrode approach at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface; effect of collecting system proximity to the tumor and to the zone of ablation; bowel proximity to the tumor and strategies to protect bowel; patterns of residual disease; and approaches at subsequent sessions. RESULTS: The initial placement of the electrode at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface did not result in significantly fewer overlapping ablations (p = 0.91) or a lower rate of residual disease (p = 0.86). Direct contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system did not increase the complication rate. However, obscuration of calyces by a central tumor was a significant predictor of collecting system hemorrhage necessitating treatment (p < 0.001) seen in three of nine tumors obscuring calyces. Clinically significant urine leaks were rare (1/100) and related to downstream obstruction. There were no bowel complications despite the fact that 27 of the tumors were within 1 cm of bowel. Protective strategies progressed from reliance on electrode positioning to hydrodissection. Residual patterns were predominantly nodules or crescents, and straight electrodes were commonly used to approach residual disease. CONCLUSION: Initial electrode position at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface does not result in less difficult or more successful ablations. Contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system does not increase the risk of complications, but obscuration of calyces does. Bowel complications are rare, and protection with hydrodissection is becoming more common. Residual tumor presents as nodules or crescents of persistent enhancement.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to review radiofrequency ablation of 100 renal tumors and lessons learned with respect to electrode approach, effects on collecting system, bowel proximity, and patterns of residual disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 6 years, 100 renal tumors in 85 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation. Images were reviewed to determine the following: effect of initial electrode approach at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface; effect of collecting system proximity to the tumor and to the zone of ablation; bowel proximity to the tumor and strategies to protect bowel; patterns of residual disease; and approaches at subsequent sessions. RESULTS: The initial placement of the electrode at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface did not result in significantly fewer overlapping ablations (p = 0.91) or a lower rate of residual disease (p = 0.86). Direct contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system did not increase the complication rate. However, obscuration of calyces by a central tumor was a significant predictor of collecting system hemorrhage necessitating treatment (p < 0.001) seen in three of nine tumors obscuring calyces. Clinically significant urine leaks were rare (1/100) and related to downstream obstruction. There were no bowel complications despite the fact that 27 of the tumors were within 1 cm of bowel. Protective strategies progressed from reliance on electrode positioning to hydrodissection. Residual patterns were predominantly nodules or crescents, and straight electrodes were commonly used to approach residual disease. CONCLUSION: Initial electrode position at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface does not result in less difficult or more successful ablations. Contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system does not increase the risk of complications, but obscuration of calyces does. Bowel complications are rare, and protection with hydrodissection is becoming more common. Residual tumor presents as nodules or crescents of persistent enhancement.
Authors: John P McGahan; Shaun Loh; Fernando J Boschini; Eric E Paoli; John M Brock; Wayne L Monsky; Chin-Shang Li Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael Z Su; Fatima Memon; Howard M Lau; Andrew J Brooks; Manish I Patel; Henry H Woo; Simon V Bariol; Philip Vladica Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: P Balageas; F Cornelis; Y Le Bras; R Hubrecht; J C Bernhard; J M Ferrière; A Ravaud; N Grenier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 5.315