Literature DB >> 15972232

Endometrial carcinosarcomas have a different prognosis and pattern of spread compared to high-risk epithelial endometrial cancer.

Frederic Amant1, Isabelle Cadron, Luca Fuso, Patrick Berteloot, Eric de Jonge, Gerd Jacomen, Johan Van Robaeys, Patrick Neven, Philippe Moerman, Ignace Vergote.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The endometrial origin of uterine carcinosarcoma has recently been well established. The current study investigates whether uterine carcinosarcomas can be included in protocols on high-risk endometrial cancer, given the similarities in biologic behavior of both entities.
METHODS: Pathological and surgical notes of patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, serous and clear cell endometrial cancer subtypes were retrospectively analyzed with special attention to the spread pattern of the different subtypes. Information on site of relapse and time to recurrence was obtained.
RESULTS: We traced 146 patients of which 9 patients were ineligible. Histological subtypes of the remaining 137 patients were as follows: 50 (37%) grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, 54 (39%) serous or clear cell carcinoma (non-endometrioid carcinoma), and 33 (24%) carcinosarcomas. Distribution of early stage disease (I and II) was 67, 46, and 78% for grade 3 endometrioid, non-endometrioid, and carcinosarcoma, respectively. Although we could not trace differences in hematogenic and transperitoneal spread among the three subtypes, non-endometrioid and carcinosarcomas were more likely to spread to pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes (P < 0.01). Using univariate analysis, both stage (P < 0.006, Wald statistic) and histological type appear to determine the outcome, whereas lymphovascular space infiltration (P < 0.25) and age (P < 0.07) were not significantly different between the three histological subtypes. Cox Regression multivariate analysis on 127 women suffering from the three histological subtypes suggested that both stage III-IV disease (P < 0.00001) and histological type (carcinosarcoma) (P < 0.003) were of prognostic significance [hazard ratio (CI 95%) were, respectively, 3.8 (2.1-7.0) and 3.2 (1.7-5.9)]. Analyzing cases limited to stage I-II endometrial cancer, 24/28 (86%) grade 3 endometrioid, 18/24 (75%) non-endometrioid, and 11/25 (44%) carcinosarcomas survived, suggesting a worse outcome for endometrial carcinosarcoma when compared to the other subtypes (P < 0.008, Log Rank). A higher incidence of pulmonary metastases explained the worse outcome for early stage carcinosarcoma (P < 0.006), whereas the incidence of liver metastasis, transperitoneal spread, or recurrences in lymph nodes or vagina were comparable between the three pathologic subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although endometrial carcinosarcoma originates from epithelial cancer, the intrinsic more aggressive tumor biology suggests that this subtype should not be incorporated in studies on high-risk epithelial endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15972232     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  24 in total

1.  Lymphadenectomy and Adjuvant Therapy Improve Survival with Uterine Carcinosarcoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marco A C Versluis; Cindy Pielsticker; Maaike A van der Aa; Marco de Bruyn; Harry Hollema; Hans W Nijman
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Extent of lymphovascular space invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Yushen Qian; Erqi L Pollom; Chika Nwachukwu; Kira Seiger; Rie von Eyben; Ann K Folkins; Elizabeth A Kidd
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Coexistence of homologous-type cervical carcinosarcoma with endometrioid-type G1 endometrial cancer: a case report with an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Eva Colas; Beata Walczyna; Maciej Joźwik; Andrzej Pyra; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Prognostic factors impacting survival in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Rebecca A Previs; Pamela T Soliman; Shannon N Westin; Ann H Klopp; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Lois M Ramondetta; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?

Authors:  Taejong Song; Chel Hun Choi; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Joseph Menczer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-11

7.  Tissue microarray analysis of hormonal signaling pathways in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Gloria S Huang; Rebecca C Arend; Maomi Li; Marc J Gunter; Lydia G Chiu; Susan Band Horwitz; Gary L Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Chyong-Huey Lai; Tzu-I Wu; Koon-Kwan Ng; Tzu-Chen Yen; Gigin Lin; Ting-Chang Chang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Swei Hsueh; Huei-Jean Huang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  [Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) of the uterus. Morphology, pathogenetic aspects and prognostic factors].

Authors:  L-C Horn; M Dallacker; K Bilek
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Evaluation of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a retrospective survey of the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit.

Authors:  Ai Otsuki; Takeo Otsuki; Hideki Tokunaga; Hitoshi Niikura; Satoru Nagase; Takashi Sugiyama; Masafumi Toyoshima; Hiroki Utsunomiya; Yoshihito Yokoyama; Hideki Mizunuma; Naoki Sato; Yukihiro Terada; Tadahiro Shoji; Toru Sugiyama; Kenji Nakahara; Tsuyoshi Ohta; Hidekazu Yamada; Toru Tase; Hiroshi Nishiyama; Keiya Fujimori; Tadao Takano; Fumiaki Takahashi; Yoh Watanabe; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.