Literature DB >> 17952435

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Kung-Chu Ho1, Chyong-Huey Lai, Tzu-I Wu, Koon-Kwan Ng, Tzu-Chen Yen, Gigin Lin, Ting-Chang Chang, Chun-Chieh Wang, Swei Hsueh, Huei-Jean Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Uterine carcinosarcomas clinically confined to the uterus usually harbor occult metastases. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in uterine carcinosarcoma.
METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma were enrolled. Abdominal and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/whole-body computed tomography (CT) scan, and whole-body (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT were undertaken for primary staging, evaluating response, and restaging/post-therapy surveillance. The clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET was determined on a scan basis.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were recruited and 31 (18)F-FDG PET scans (including 8 scans performed on a PET/CT scanner) were performed. Positive impacts of scans were found in 36.8% (7/19) for primary staging, 66.7% (2/3) for monitoring response, and 11.1% (1/9) for restaging/post-therapy surveillance. PET excluded falsely inoperable disease defined by MRI in two patients. Aggressive treatment applying to three patients with PET-defined resectable stage IVB disease seemed futile. Two patients died of disease shortly after salvage therapy restaged by PET. With PET monitoring, one stage IVB patient treated by targeted therapy only was alive with good performance. Using PET did not lead to improvement of overall survival of this series compared with the historical control (n = 35) (P = 0.779).
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results suggest that (18)F-FDG PET is beneficial in excluding falsely inoperable disease for curative therapy and in making a decision on palliation for better quality of life instead of aggressive treatment under the guidance of PET. PET seems to have limited value in post-therapy surveillance or restaging after failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952435     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0533-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

1.  Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathological multicenter CTF study.

Authors:  E Sartori; L Bazzurini; A Gadducci; F Landoni; A Lissoni; T Maggino; P Zola; B La Face
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Patterns of metastasis in uterine sarcoma. An autopsy study.

Authors:  P G Rose; M S Piver; Y Tsukada; T Lau
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The hormonal receptor status of uterine carcinosarcomas (mixed müllerian tumours): an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  A C Ansink; P A Cross; P Scorer; A de Barros Lopes; J M Monaghan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose of uterine sarcoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and power Doppler imaging.

Authors:  N Umesaki; T Tanaka; M Miyama; N Kawamura; S Ogita; J Kawabe; T Okamura; K Koyama; H Ochi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  18F-FDG PET in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Angel Chao; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Huei-Jean Huang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tzu-I Wu; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mesodermal tumor) of the uterus. A Gynecologic Oncology Group pathologic study of 203 cases.

Authors:  S G Silverberg; F J Major; J A Blessing; B Fetter; F B Askin; S Y Liao; A Miller
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Paclitaxel in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  J P Curtin; J A Blessing; J T Soper; K DeGeest
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Tatsuo Torizuka; Toshihiko Kanno; Masami Futatsubashi; Hiroyuki Okada; Etsuji Yoshikawa; Fumitoshi Nakamura; Munetaka Takekuma; Makoto Maeda; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Analysis of clinicopathologic factors in malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterine corpus.

Authors:  P Inthasorn; J Carter; S Valmadre; P Beale; P Russell; C Dalrymple
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  F J Major; J A Blessing; S G Silverberg; C P Morrow; W T Creasman; J L Currie; E Yordan; M F Brady
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bilateral Tubo-Ovarian Abscess Mimics Ovarian Cancer on MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Rajan Rakheja; William Makis; Marc Hickeson
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mixed Mullerian Tumour: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Pratiksha Yadav; Vidhi Bakshi; Rajul Bhargava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 3.  Novel imaging modalities in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Brooks; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in the Preoperative Evaluation of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Young Tae Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Jung-Yun Lee; Won Jun Kang
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-11

5.  Uterine carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed müllerian tumours): a review with special emphasis on the controversies in management.

Authors:  Rani Kanthan; Jenna-Lynn Senger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-10-05

6.  Prognostic value of metabolic parameters determined by preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Lee; Jong Jin Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Jong Hyeok Kim; Yong Man Kim; Young Tak Kim; Joo Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Differentiation of aggressive and indolent subtypes of uterine sarcoma using maximum standardized uptake value.

Authors:  Elaine Yuen Phin Lee; Pek-Lan Khong; Ka Yu Tse; Karen Kar Loen Chan; Mandy Man Yee Chu; Hextan Yuen Sheung Ngan
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a rare case of recurrent malignant mixed mullerian tumor.

Authors:  Amit Bhoil; Raghava Kashyap; Anish Bhattacharya; Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01

9.  Outcome and Predictive Factors in Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Rare Cancer Network Study.

Authors:  Daniel R Zwahlen; Ulrike Schick; Yasemin Bolukbasi; Juliette Thariat; Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak; Abraham Kuten; Sefik Igdem; Hale Caglar; Zeynep Ozsaran; Kristina Loessl; Kaouthar Khanfir Belkaaloul; Sylviane Villette; Hansjörg Vees
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 10.  Laparoscopic surgery on broken points for uterine sarcoma in the early stage decrease prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Yi Zhu; Guo-Nan Zhang; Chang Wang; Chao Li; Yu Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.