Literature DB >> 15967993

The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior.

Damon A Clark1, Lars C Grant.   

Abstract

Swimming bacteria detect chemical gradients by performing temporal comparisons of recent measurements of chemical concentration. These comparisons are described quantitatively by the chemotactic response function, which we expect to optimize chemotactic behavioral performance. We identify two independent chemotactic performance criteria: In the short run, a favorable response function should move bacteria up chemoattractant gradients; in the long run, bacteria should aggregate at peaks of chemoattractant concentration. Surprisingly, these two criteria conflict, so that when one performance criterion is most favorable, the other is unfavorable. Because both types of behavior are biologically relevant, we include both behaviors in a composite optimization that yields a response function that closely resembles experimental measurements. Our work suggests that the bacterial chemotactic response function can be derived from simple behavioral considerations and sheds light on how the response function contributes to chemotactic performance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967993      PMCID: PMC1166586          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407659102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of nonchemotactic CheZ mutants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K C Boesch; R E Silversmith; R B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments.

Authors:  L Turner; W S Ryu; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Chemotaxis of bacteria in glass capillary arrays. Escherichia coli, motility, microchannel plate, and light scattering.

Authors:  H C Berg; L Turner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Bacterial chemotaxis and the molecular logic of intracellular signal transduction networks.

Authors:  J B Stock; G S Lukat; A M Stock
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1991

6.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  U Alon; M G Surette; N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S H Larsen; R W Reader; E N Kort; W W Tso; J Adler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells.

Authors:  D Bray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chemotaxis: the role of internal delays.

Authors:  P-G de Gennes
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 1.733

10.  Coordination of flagella on filamentous cells of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Ishihara; J E Segall; S M Block; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  34 in total

1.  Noninvasive inference of the molecular chemotactic response using bacterial trajectories.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Masson; Guillaume Voisinne; Jerome Wong-Ng; Antonio Celani; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of cyto/chemokine degradation in effective intercellular communication distances.

Authors:  V K Gupta
Journal:  Physica A       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response.

Authors:  Antonio Celani; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Migration of chemotactic bacteria in soft agar: role of gel concentration.

Authors:  Ottavio A Croze; Gail P Ferguson; Michael E Cates; Wilson C K Poon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The relation of signal transduction to the sensitivity and dynamic range of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Toshinori Namba; Masatoshi Nishikawa; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Environment determines evolutionary trajectory in a constrained phenotypic space.

Authors:  David T Fraebel; Harry Mickalide; Diane Schnitkey; Jason Merritt; Thomas E Kuhlman; Seppe Kuehn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Contrasting responses within a single neuron class enable sex-specific attraction in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Anusha Narayan; Vivek Venkatachalam; Omer Durak; Douglas K Reilly; Neelanjan Bose; Frank C Schroeder; Aravinthan D T Samuel; Jagan Srinivasan; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The thermal impulse response of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Eli Paster; William S Ryu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Nonadaptive fluctuation in an adaptive sensory system: bacterial chemoreceptor.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nishikawa; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Diana Clausznitzer; Olga Oleksiuk; Linda Løvdok; Victor Sourjik; Robert G Endres
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.