Literature DB >> 15965910

Scaffold mesh size affects the osteoblastic differentiation of seeded marrow stromal cells cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor.

Heidi L Holtorf1, Néha Datta, John A Jansen, Antonios G Mikos.   

Abstract

In this study, we cultured marrow stromal cells on titanium fiber meshes in a flow perfusion bioreactor and examined the effect of altering scaffold mesh size on cell behavior in an effort to develop a bone tissue construct composed of a scaffold, osteogenic cells, and extracellular matrix. Scaffolds of differing mesh size, that is, distance between fibers, were created by altering the diameter of the mesh fibers (20 or 40 microm) while maintaining a constant porosity. These scaffolds had a porosity of 80% and mesh sizes of 65 microm (20-microm fibers) or 119 microm (40-microm fibers). Cell/scaffold constructs were grown in static culture or under flow for up to 16 days and assayed for osteoblastic differentiation. Cellularity was higher at early time points and Ca2+ deposition was higher at later time points for flow constructs over static controls. The 20-microm mesh had reduced cellularity in static culture. Under flow conditions, mass transport limitations are mitigated allowing uniform cell growth throughout the scaffold, and there was no difference in cellularity between mesh types. There was greater alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, osteopontin levels, and calcium under flow at 8 days for the 40-microm mesh compared to the 20-microm mesh. However, by day 16, the trend was reversed, suggesting the time course of differentiation was dependent on scaffold mesh size under flow conditions. However, this dependence was not linear with respect to time; larger mesh size was conducive to early osteoblast differentiation while smaller mesh size was conducive to later differentiation and matrix deposition. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965910     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  26 in total

1.  Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Douglas J Adams; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  [Observing the health need of the community].

Authors:  M Hanada
Journal:  Kango       Date:  1979-09

3.  Investigating the role of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in regulating the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Jiehong Liao; Kyle E Hammerick; Grant A Challen; Margaret A Goodell; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  In vitro generated extracellular matrix and fluid shear stress synergistically enhance 3D osteoblastic differentiation.

Authors:  Néha Datta; Quynh P Pham; Upma Sharma; Vassilios I Sikavitsas; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

6.  Modulation of osteogenic properties of biodegradable polymer/extracellular matrix scaffolds generated with a flow perfusion bioreactor.

Authors:  Jiehong Liao; Xuan Guo; Dan Nelson; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  The enhanced effect of surface microstructured porous titanium on adhesion and osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  J Yang; J Wang; T Yuan; X D Zhu; Z Xiang; Y J Fan; X D Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on pregenerated extracellular matrix scaffolds in the absence of osteogenic cell culture supplements.

Authors:  Richard A Thibault; L Scott Baggett; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Cotton wool-like poly(lactic acid)/vaterite composite scaffolds releasing soluble silica for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Akiko Obata; Hiroki Ozasa; Toshihiro Kasuga; Julian R Jones
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Scaffold stiffness influences cell behavior: opportunities for skeletal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Roel G M Breuls; Timothy U Jiya; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.