Literature DB >> 15965570

Beta-Adrenergic blockers as antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory compounds: an overview.

Bramah N Singh1.   

Abstract

Beta-Adrenergic blockers have a wide spectrum of action for controlling cardiac arrhythmias that is larger than initially thought. Data from the past several decades indicate that, as an antiarrhythmic class, beta-blockers remain among the very few pharmacologic agents that reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death, prolong survival, and ameliorate symptoms caused by arrhythmias in patients with cardiac disease. As a class of compounds, beta-blockers have a fundamental pharmacologic property that attenuates the effects of competitive adrenergic receptors. However, the net clinical effects of the different beta-receptor blockers may vary quantitatively because of variations in associated intrinsic sympathomimetic agonism and in their intrinsic potency for binding to beta-receptors. These individual compounds also differ in their selectivity for beta(1)- and beta(2)-receptors. Metoprolol is a beta(1)-selective blocker, whereas carvedilol is a nonselective beta(1)- and beta(2)-blocker, an antioxidant, and has a propensity to inhibit alpha(1)-receptors and endothelin. Evolving data from controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials suggest that there are clinically significant differences among this class of drugs. Recent evidence also suggests that the antiarrhythmic actions of certain beta-receptor blockers such as carvedilol and metoprolol extend beyond the ventricular tissue to encompass atrial cells and help maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in combination with potent antifibrillatory agents such as amiodarone. This introduction provides a current perspective on these newer developments in the understanding of the antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory actions of beta-blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965570     DOI: 10.1177/10742484050100i402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1074-2484            Impact factor:   2.457


  6 in total

Review 1.  Arrhythmogenic and metabolic remodelling of failing human heart.

Authors:  C R Gloschat; A C Koppel; K K Aras; J A Brennan; K M Holzem; I R Efimov
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate.

Authors:  Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Giovanni Ballerini; Carlo Quaglia; Enrica Nobili; Alessandra Magini; Erika Bertella; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of S(-)-atenolol in rats: reduction of isoprenaline-induced tachycardia as a continuous pharmacodynamic endpoint.

Authors:  T J van Steeg; J Freijer; M Danhof; E C M de Lange
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Exercise worsening of electromechanical disturbances: A predictor of arrhythmia in long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Dafni Charisopoulou; George Koulaouzidis; Annika Rydberg; Henein Y Michael
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Advances in Cardiac Pacing: Arrhythmia Prediction, Prevention and Control Strategies.

Authors:  Mehrie Harshad Patel; Shrikanth Sampath; Anoushka Kapoor; Devanshi Narendra Damani; Nikitha Chellapuram; Apurva Bhavana Challa; Manmeet Pal Kaur; Richard D Walton; Stavros Stavrakis; Shivaram P Arunachalam; Kanchan Kulkarni
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Reversed Apico-Basal Myocardial Relaxation Sequence During Exercise in Long QT Syndrome Mutations Carriers With History of Previous Cardiac Events.

Authors:  Dafni Charisopoulou; George Koulaouzidis; Annika Rydberg; Michael Y Henein
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.