BACKGROUND: Female patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) exhibit higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates compared to male patients. However, contradictory evidence exists on whether this survival disadvantage disappears after adjustment for age and other prognostic factors. This study, based on a countrywide survey of consecutive unselected patients with acute MI, examined whether female gender is an independent predictor of poor short-term outcome and less intensive in-hospital treatment. METHODS: Data on a total of 7433 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64+/-13 years and the proportion of females in this population was 23%. Univariate and multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality in female patients were estimated. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates of women were significantly higher compared to men (17.7 vs. 8.6, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in the total population [relative risk (RR)=1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-1.64, p=0.036]. The RR of women for in-hospital death was exaggerated among younger patients, aged <55 years (RR=3.84, 95% CI=1.07-13.74, p=0.039). Female gender was also independently and inversely associated with administration of thrombolytic treatment (RR=0.724, 95% CI=0.630-0.831, p=<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although female gender is an independent predictor of higher post-MI in-hospital mortality with a pronounced effect among younger patients, women are less likely to receive thrombolysis than men. Based on the results from this countrywide study, we should consider women, especially of younger age, as patients at particular high risk, who contrary to common practice, deserve more intensive and aggressive in-hospital treatment.
BACKGROUND: Female patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) exhibit higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates compared to male patients. However, contradictory evidence exists on whether this survival disadvantage disappears after adjustment for age and other prognostic factors. This study, based on a countrywide survey of consecutive unselected patients with acute MI, examined whether female gender is an independent predictor of poor short-term outcome and less intensive in-hospital treatment. METHODS: Data on a total of 7433 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64+/-13 years and the proportion of females in this population was 23%. Univariate and multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality in female patients were estimated. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates of women were significantly higher compared to men (17.7 vs. 8.6, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in the total population [relative risk (RR)=1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-1.64, p=0.036]. The RR of women for in-hospital death was exaggerated among younger patients, aged <55 years (RR=3.84, 95% CI=1.07-13.74, p=0.039). Female gender was also independently and inversely associated with administration of thrombolytic treatment (RR=0.724, 95% CI=0.630-0.831, p=<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although female gender is an independent predictor of higher post-MI in-hospital mortality with a pronounced effect among younger patients, women are less likely to receive thrombolysis than men. Based on the results from this countrywide study, we should consider women, especially of younger age, as patients at particular high risk, who contrary to common practice, deserve more intensive and aggressive in-hospital treatment.
Authors: Diana A Chirinos; Josefina Medina-Lezama; Belissa Salinas-Najarro; William Arguelles; Maria M Llabre; Neil Schneiderman; Roberto Paz-Manrique; Juan F Bolanos; Zubair Khan; Julio A Chirinos Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-09-30
Authors: Viola Vaccarino; Amit J Shah; Cherie Rooks; Ijeoma Ibeanu; Jonathon A Nye; Pratik Pimple; Amy Salerno; Luis D'Marco; Cristina Karohl; James Douglas Bremner; Paolo Raggi Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Hoa L Nguyen; Jane S Saczynski; Joel M Gore; Molly E Waring; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski; George Reed; Frederick A Spencer; Shu-xia Li; Robert J Goldberg Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Hanna-Riikka Lehto; Seppo Lehto; Aki Samuli Havulinna; Matti Ketonen; Aapo Lehtonen; Yrjö Antero Kesäniemi; Kari Juhani Airaksinen; Veikko Salomaa Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: K P Champney; P D Frederick; H Bueno; S Parashar; J Foody; C N B Merz; J G Canto; J H Lichtman; V Vaccarino Journal: Heart Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Archana Singh-Manoux; Alice Guéguen; Jane Ferrie; Martin Shipley; Pekka Martikainen; Sébastien Bonenfant; Marcel Goldberg; Michael Marmot Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Petr Widimsky; William Wijns; Jean Fajadet; Mark de Belder; Jiri Knot; Lars Aaberge; George Andrikopoulos; Jose Antonio Baz; Amadeo Betriu; Marc Claeys; Nicholas Danchin; Slaveyko Djambazov; Paul Erne; Juha Hartikainen; Kurt Huber; Petr Kala; Milka Klinceva; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Peter Ludman; Josephina Mauri Ferre; Bela Merkely; Davor Milicic; Joao Morais; Marko Noc; Grzegorz Opolski; Miodrag Ostojic; Dragana Radovanovic; Stefano De Servi; Ulf Stenestrand; Martin Studencan; Marco Tubaro; Zorana Vasiljevic; Franz Weidinger; Adam Witkowski; Uwe Zeymer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 29.983