Literature DB >> 15961762

Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Jeffery W Saranchuk1, Michael W Kattan, Elena Elkin, A Karim Touijer, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most favorable outcome that can be achieved after radical prostatectomy is complete tumor resection without recurrence and full recovery of continence and potency. Risks of erectile dysfunction, incontinence, and disease recurrence are well described, but in isolation, do not adequately inform patients of the possibility of becoming cancer-free while at the same time returning to their preoperative functional state. We sought to determine the frequency of optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy and the time to such outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy performed at a tertiary referral center between July 1998 and July 2003 for clinical stage T1 to T3 prostate cancer were identified. Patients were excluded if they were incontinent or impotent preoperatively, or if they had received radiotherapy or neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy previously. Six hundred forty-seven patients were analyzed for time to recovery of full continence and potency without cancer recurrence after surgery. Optimal outcome probability was calculated with a Markov state transition model to simulate clinical outcomes in the first 4 years following radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 years, and mean pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was 6.9 ng/mL. Cancer-free status with full continence and potency was achieved in 30% of men at 12 months, 42% at 24 months, 47% at 36 months, and 53% at 48 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy can be achieved in a small majority of cases. Time to full recovery is primarily dictated by recovery of erectile function. This information is helpful for patients interested in their chances of returning to their preoperative functional state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15961762     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R Jarvis; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Robotic prostatectomy: hit or myth?

Authors:  Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Roberto Miano; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Enrico Spera; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Camille Mugnier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Unexpected Long-term Improvements in Urinary and Erectile Function in a Large Cohort of Men with Self-reported Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Justin K Lee; Melissa Assel; Alan E Thong; Daniel D Sjoberg; John P Mulhall; Jaspreet Sandhu; Andrew J Vickers; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Multiphoton microscopy for structure identification in human prostate and periprostatic tissue: implications in prostate cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Maria M Shevchuk; Joshua Sterling; Sonal Grover; Michael Herman; Rajiv Yadav; Kumaran Mudalair; Abhishek Srivastava; Mark A Rubin; Warren R Zipfel; Frederick R Maxfield; Chris Xu; Watt W Webb; Sushmita Mukherjee
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raanan Tal; Hannah H Alphs; Paul Krebs; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.