K Kojo1, E Pukkala, A Auvinen. 1. STUK-Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland. katja.kojo@uta.fi
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have found increased breast cancer risk among female cabin crew. This has been suggested to reflect lifestyle factors (for example, age at first birth), other confounding factors (for example, age at menarche), or occupational factors such as exposure to cosmic radiation and circadian rhythm alterations due to repeated jet lag. AIMS: To assess the contribution of occupational versus lifestyle and other factors to breast cancer risk among cabin attendants in Finland. METHODS: A standardised self-administered questionnaire on demographic, occupational, and lifestyle factors was given to 1041 cabin attendants. A total of 27 breast cancer cases and 517 non-cases completed the questionnaire. Breast cancer diagnoses were confirmed through the Finnish Cancer Registry. Exposure to cosmic radiation was estimated based on self-reported flight history and timetables. A conditional logistic regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, family history of breast cancer (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.00 to 7.08) was the strongest determinant of breast cancer. Of occupational exposures, sleep rhythm disruptions (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.70 to 4.27) were positively related and disruption of menstrual cycles (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.96) negatively related to breast cancer. However, both associations were statistically non-significant. Cumulative radiation dose (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.19) showed no effect on breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that breast cancer risk among Finnish cabin attendants is related to well established risk factors of breast cancer, such as family history of breast cancer. There was no clear evidence that the three occupational factors studied affected breast cancer risk among Finnish flight attendants.
BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have found increased breast cancer risk among female cabin crew. This has been suggested to reflect lifestyle factors (for example, age at first birth), other confounding factors (for example, age at menarche), or occupational factors such as exposure to cosmic radiation and circadian rhythm alterations due to repeated jet lag. AIMS: To assess the contribution of occupational versus lifestyle and other factors to breast cancer risk among cabin attendants in Finland. METHODS: A standardised self-administered questionnaire on demographic, occupational, and lifestyle factors was given to 1041 cabin attendants. A total of 27 breast cancer cases and 517 non-cases completed the questionnaire. Breast cancer diagnoses were confirmed through the Finnish Cancer Registry. Exposure to cosmic radiation was estimated based on self-reported flight history and timetables. A conditional logistic regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, family history of breast cancer (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.00 to 7.08) was the strongest determinant of breast cancer. Of occupational exposures, sleep rhythm disruptions (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.70 to 4.27) were positively related and disruption of menstrual cycles (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.96) negatively related to breast cancer. However, both associations were statistically non-significant. Cumulative radiation dose (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.19) showed no effect on breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that breast cancer risk among Finnish cabin attendants is related to well established risk factors of breast cancer, such as family history of breast cancer. There was no clear evidence that the three occupational factors studied affected breast cancer risk among Finnish flight attendants.
Authors: Peggy Reynolds; James Cone; Michael Layefsky; Debbie E Goldberg; Susan Hurley Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Aparna K Mohan; Michael Hauptmann; Martha S Linet; Elaine Ron; Jay H Lubin; D Michal Freedman; Bruce H Alexander; John D Boice; Michele Morin Doody; Genevieve M Matanoski Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-06-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah Forbes-Robertson; Edward Dudley; Pankaj Vadgama; Christian Cook; Scott Drawer; Liam Kilduff Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Chunla He; Sonia Taj Anand; Mark H Ebell; John E Vena; Sara Wagner Robb Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: José Angel García-Sáenz; Miguel Martín; Marisa Maestro; Marta Vidaurreta; Silvia Veganzones; Laura Villalobos; Laura Rodríguez-Lajusticia; Sara Rafael; María Teresa Sanz-Casla; Antonio Casado; Javier Sastre; Manuel Arroyo; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Linda A Toth; Rita A Trammell; Teresa Liberati; Steve Verhulst; Marcia L Hart; Jacob E Moskowitz; Craig Franklin Journal: Comp Med Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Thomas C Erren; Puran Falaturi; Peter Morfeld; Peter Knauth; Russel J Reiter; Claus Piekarski Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jeri L Anderson; Misty J Hein; Mark P Little; Alice J Sigurdson; Lynne E Pinkerton Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.214