BACKGROUND: In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified shift work with circadian disruption or chronodisruption as a probable human carcinogen. Short-term disturbances of biological 24-hour-rhythms following exposures to light and darkness at unusual times are well-known as "jet-lag" and "shift-lag" symptoms. However, that chronic disturbances or disruptions of timely sequenced circadian rhythms (chronodisruption) should contribute to long-term developments of cancer is a relatively new concept. This review provides background and practical information with regard to the open question "does shift-work cause cancer?" METHODS: Overview on the basis of a selective literature search via Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge until 2009 from the viewpoints of occupational medicine, epidemiology, chronobiology, and occupational science. RESULTS: The postulated causal links between shift-work and cancer in humans are biologically plausible in the light of experimental findings, but to date we lack epidemiological studies which could describe or exonerate risks in humans. Monetary compensation has already been paid for such cases in at least one country (Denmark). In Germany, however, according to the applicable law, a new occupational disease can only be recognized when certain conditions for the recognition of "general scientific merit" have been met. We present the current state of knowledge regarding prevention. CONCLUSION: While causal links between shift-work and cancer developments are not established, future shift-work planning should pay more attention to insights from occupational medicine, chronobiology, and occupational science.
BACKGROUND: In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified shift work with circadian disruption or chronodisruption as a probable human carcinogen. Short-term disturbances of biological 24-hour-rhythms following exposures to light and darkness at unusual times are well-known as "jet-lag" and "shift-lag" symptoms. However, that chronic disturbances or disruptions of timely sequenced circadian rhythms (chronodisruption) should contribute to long-term developments of cancer is a relatively new concept. This review provides background and practical information with regard to the open question "does shift-work cause cancer?" METHODS: Overview on the basis of a selective literature search via Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge until 2009 from the viewpoints of occupational medicine, epidemiology, chronobiology, and occupational science. RESULTS: The postulated causal links between shift-work and cancer in humans are biologically plausible in the light of experimental findings, but to date we lack epidemiological studies which could describe or exonerate risks in humans. Monetary compensation has already been paid for such cases in at least one country (Denmark). In Germany, however, according to the applicable law, a new occupational disease can only be recognized when certain conditions for the recognition of "general scientific merit" have been met. We present the current state of knowledge regarding prevention. CONCLUSION: While causal links between shift-work and cancer developments are not established, future shift-work planning should pay more attention to insights from occupational medicine, chronobiology, and occupational science.
Authors: Eero Pukkala; Matti Ojamo; Sirkka-Liisa Rudanko; Richard G Stevens; Pia K Verkasalo Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: M Kakizaki; S Kuriyama; T Sone; K Ohmori-Matsuda; A Hozawa; N Nakaya; S Fukudo; I Tsuji Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kathryn M Emmer; Kathryn L G Russart; William H Walker; Randy J Nelson; A Courtney DeVries Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Gaël P Hammer; Katharina Emrich; Michael Nasterlack; Maria Blettner; Mei Yong Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 5.594