Literature DB >> 15959704

Fate of triclosan and triclosan-methyl in sewage treatment plants and surface waters.

Kai Bester1.   

Abstract

The fate of triclosan in diverse stages of two sewage treatment processes has been determined. The elimination process differed considerably depending on the technology applied in the respective sewage treatment plant (STP). The plant operating with a two-stage biologic (activated sludge) process removed triclosan more efficiently than the STP with a combination of physical and activated sludge process. The treatment in the aeration basin was the dominant elimination mechanism, whereas the final biologic filter was not very effective. The elimination rates for triclosan were 87% and 95%, respectively. These data were compared with emissions of a multitude of STPs in the river Ruhr catchment area as well as triclosan and its known transformation product, triclosan-methyl, in the river. The concentrations of both compounds were between <3 and 10 ng/L in true surface-water samples for triclosan and between 0.3 and 10 ng/L for triclosan-methyl. The STP effluents held higher concentrations (10 to 600 ng/L triclosan). The ratio of triclosan to triclosan-methyl did not change significantly within the longitudinal profile of the river, but diverse STPs discharging to the river exhibited individual triclosan-to-triclosan-methyl ratios. From the riverine concentration data, in-river elimination rates and half-life were estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959704     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-004-0155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  31 in total

Review 1.  Triclosan--the forgotten priority substance?

Authors:  Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Werner Brack
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Occurrence and potential risk of triclosan in freshwaters of São Paulo, Brazil--the need for regulatory actions.

Authors:  Cassiana C Montagner; Wilson F Jardim; Peter C Von der Ohe; Gisela A Umbuzeiro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Degradation of PPCPs in activated sludge from different WWTPs in Denmark.

Authors:  Xijuan Chen; Jes Vollertsen; Jeppe Lund Nielsen; Agnieszka Gieraltowska Dall; Kai Bester
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Urinary concentrations of environmental phenols and their associations with breast cancer incidence and mortality following breast cancer.

Authors:  Humberto Parada; Marilie D Gammon; Hope L Ettore; Jia Chen; Antonia M Calafat; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Mary S Wolff; Susan L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  GC/MS analysis of triclosan and its degradation by-products in wastewater and sludge samples from different treatments.

Authors:  Fatemeh Tohidi; Zongwei Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Comparison of hepatotoxicity and mechanisms induced by triclosan (TCS) and methyl-triclosan (MTCS) in human liver hepatocellular HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Boyu Mao; Huixin He; Yu Shang; Yufang Zhong; Zhiqiang Yu; Yiting Yang; Hui Li; Jing An
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Toxicogenomic response of Rhodospirillum rubrum S1H to the micropollutant triclosan.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Guido Vanermen; Pieter Monsieurs; Heleen De Wever; Max Mergeay; Willy Verstraete; Natalie Leys
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Meta-analysis of mass balances examining chemical fate during wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Jochen Heidler; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.