Literature DB >> 1595961

Interaction of bovine chorioallantoic membrane explants with three strains of Brucella abortus.

L E Samartino1, F M Enright.   

Abstract

Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) explants were used to determine the in vitro growth and cytotoxic potential of 3 strains of Brucella abortus. Bovine CAM explants were inoculated with 2 x 10(7) colony-forming units of the pathogenic strain 2308, attenuated strain 19, or the rough strain RB51 of B abortus. After inoculation, the explants were harvested and examined at 2 or 4 hours, 12 or 14 hours, and 24 or 26 hours of incubation. Bacterial growth associated with each explant was determined by counting colony-forming units. The degree of cellular damage in each explant associated either with bacterial growth or bacterial toxins was evaluated by morphometric analysis after trypan blue staining. Significant differences were not detected in the numbers of bacteria of any strain of B abortus in the CAM explants at comparable time intervals. The rate of growth of the bacteria in CAM explants was higher between 2 and 12 hours after inoculation than between 12 and 24 hours after inoculation. Cytotoxic effects associated with strain 2308 were significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that caused by other strains. Cytotoxic effects associated with strain 19 and rough strain RB51 were similar, and both were significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than the phosphate buffer solution control. Chorioallantoic membrane explants inoculated with a filtrate of heat-killed strain 2308 induced minimal cellular damage, compared with that caused by the viable bacteria. These results indicated that the number of B abortus in trophoblasts was independent of the degree of cellular damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1595961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Vaccination with Brucella abortus rough mutant RB51 protects BALB/c mice against virulent strains of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella ovis.

Authors:  M P Jiménez de Bagüés; P H Elzer; S M Jones; J M Blasco; F M Enright; G G Schurig; A J Winter
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Modulation of the bovine trophoblastic innate immune response by Brucella abortus.

Authors:  Alcina V Carvalho Neta; Ana P R Stynen; Tatiane A Paixão; Karina L Miranda; Fabiana L Silva; Christelle M Roux; Renée M Tsolis; Robin E Everts; Harris A Lewin; L Garry Adams; Alex F Carvalho; Andrey P Lage; Renato L Santos
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Early transcriptional responses of bovine chorioallantoic membrane explants to wild type, ΔvirB2 or ΔbtpB Brucella abortus infection.

Authors:  Juliana P S Mol; Erica A Costa; Alex F Carvalho; Yao-Hui Sun; Reneé M Tsolis; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Brucella Genital Tropism: What's on the Menu.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Letesson; Thibault Barbier; Amaia Zúñiga-Ripa; Jacques Godfroid; Xavier De Bolle; Ignacio Moriyón
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis and the brucellosis model at the individual level of dairy cattle in the West Bandung District, Indonesia.

Authors:  Yuli Yanti; Bambang Sumiarto; Tri Anggraeni Kusumastuti; Aprizal Panus; Sodirun Sodirun
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-01-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.