Literature DB >> 15958602

Influence of path integration versus environmental orientation on place cell remapping between visually identical environments.

Mark C Fuhs1, Shea R Vanrhoads, Amanda E Casale, Bruce McNaughton, David S Touretzky.   

Abstract

To assess the effects of interactions between angular path integration and visual landmarks on the firing of hippocampal neurons, we recorded from CA1 pyramidal cells as rats foraged in two identical boxes with polarizing internal cues. In the same-orientation condition, following an earlier experiment by Skaggs and McNaughton, the boxes were oriented identically and connected by a corridor. In the opposite-orientation condition, the boxes were abutted by rotating them 90 degrees in opposite directions, so that their orientations differed by 180 degrees . After 16-23 days of pretraining on the same-orientation condition, three rats experienced both conditions in counterbalanced order on each of two consecutive days. On the third day they ran two opposite-orientation trials. Although Skaggs and McNaughton observed stable partial "remapping" of place fields, none of the fields in this experiment remapped in the same-orientation condition. In the opposite-orientation condition, place fields in the first box were isomorphic with those in the same-orientation condition, whereas in the second box the rats eventually exhibited completely different fields. The rats differed as to the trial in which this first occurred. Once the second box exhibited different fields, it continued to do so in all subsequent opposite-orientation trials, yet fields remained the same in subsequent same-orientation trials. The results demonstrate that when animals move actively between environments, and are thus potentially able to maintain their inertial angular orientation, discordance between environmental orientation and the rat's idiothetic direction sense can profoundly affect the hippocampal map-either immediately, or as a result of cumulative experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958602     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00132.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Attractor-map versus autoassociation based attractor dynamics in the hippocampal network.

Authors:  Laura L Colgin; Stefan Leutgeb; Karel Jezek; Jill K Leutgeb; Edvard I Moser; Bruce L McNaughton; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Hippocampal Place Fields Maintain a Coherent and Flexible Map across Long Timescales.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Kinsky; David W Sullivan; William Mau; Michael E Hasselmo; Howard B Eichenbaum
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Field repetition and local mapping in the hippocampus and the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Roddy M Grieves; Éléonore Duvelle; Emma R Wood; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Selective excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus and basolateral amygdala have dissociable effects on appetitive cue and place conditioning based on path integration in a novel Y-maze procedure.

Authors:  Rutsuko Ito; Trevor W Robbins; Bruce L McNaughton; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Experience-dependent firing rate remapping generates directional selectivity in hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  Zaneta Navratilova; Lan T Hoang; C Daniela Schwindel; Masami Tatsuno; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Place field repetition and spatial learning in a multicompartment environment.

Authors:  Roddy M Grieves; Bryan W Jenkins; Bruce C Harland; Emma R Wood; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Experience-Dependency of Reliance on Local Visual and Idiothetic Cues for Spatial Representations Created in the Absence of Distal Information.

Authors:  Fabian Draht; Sijie Zhang; Abdelrahman Rayan; Fabian Schönfeld; Laurenz Wiskott; Denise Manahan-Vaughan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Post-training Inactivation of the Anterior Thalamic Nuclei Impairs Spatial Performance on the Radial Arm Maze.

Authors:  Ryan E Harvey; Shannon M Thompson; Lilliana M Sanchez; Ryan M Yoder; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Place field repetition and purely local remapping in a multicompartment environment.

Authors:  Hugo J Spiers; Robin M A Hayman; Aleksandar Jovalekic; Elizabeth Marozzi; Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.