Literature DB >> 15958253

Market for colorectal cancer screening by endoscopy in the United States.

Florence K Tangka1, Noelle-Angelique M Molinari, Sajal K Chattopadhyay, Laura C Seeff.   

Abstract

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third among all cancer sites in incidence, and second in cancer-related mortality. Although screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality, current screening rates among the average-risk population are low. The traditional way of promoting CRC screening has been to educate healthcare providers and the public on its benefits, available screening procedures, and current guidelines. In this paper, we focus on economics and provide an overview of some key factors that affect the demand for and the supply of CRC screening by endoscopy. Factors affecting the demand for endoscopic CRC screening include the number of people for whom screening is recommended, consumers' income and health insurance status, time and travel costs, prices of non-endoscopic CRC screening tests, and personal preferences and perceived quality of care. Factors influencing the supply of endoscopic screening include the availability of endoscopic providers, increased efficiency, procedure costs, current reimbursement rates for endoscopic procedures, and technical progress. The volume of screening tests in the market is determined jointly by the collective demand and supply decisions of consumers and providers. The discussion includes policy implications for the current effort to promote widespread use of CRC screening in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958253     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

2.  Managed care and the diffusion of endoscopy in fee-for-service Medicare.

Authors:  Lee Rivers Mobley; Sujha Subramanian; Julia Koschinsky; H E Frech; Laurel Clayton Trantham; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.

Authors:  Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zoepf; Michael Nuefer; Florian Grabellus; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions.

Authors:  Julia B Pilz; Susanne Portmann; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; Lukas Degen
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Medicare modernization and diffusion of endoscopy in FFS medicare.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Pedro Amaral; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Mei Zhou; Srimoyee Bose
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-03-09

7.  Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Authors:  Lee Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; John Boos; Nancy Lozano-Gracia; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.506

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.