Literature DB >> 15958007

Investigating the relationship between affluence and elective caesarean sections.

Bernadette Alves1, Aziz Sheikh.   

Abstract

The proportion of women delivering by caesarean section has increased dramatically in England and many westernised countries. It has been suggested that one important reason for this increase is the growing proportion of women opting for elective caesareans for lifestyle reasons, a trend that is, it is argued, most common among the affluent. We investigated the hypothesis that affluent women are more likely to deliver by elective caesarean section. Logistic regression modelling was used to analyse data from half a million women who delivered in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2000. We found that women living in the most affluent areas of England were significantly more likely to have an elective caesarean section than their deprived counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958007     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00657.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  9 in total

1.  Patient-choice vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Lawrence M Leeman; Lauren A Plante
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000.

Authors:  Lesley Fairley; Ruth Dundas; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Socioeconomic position early in adolescence and mode of delivery later in life: findings from a Portuguese birth cohort.

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Susana Silva; Milton Severo; Henrique Barros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of delivery characteristics and socioeconomic status on giving birth by caesarean section - a cross sectional study during 2000-2010 in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Mika Gissler; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Pregnancy-associated outcomes in women who spent some of their childhood looked after by local authorities: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Stella K Botchway; Maria A Quigley; Ron Gray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Risk of Adverse Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes by Maternal Age: Quantifying Individual and Population Level Risk Using Routine UK Maternity Data.

Authors:  Laura Oakley; Nicole Penn; Maria Pipi; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Pat Doyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of in vivo effects of Oxytocin on coagulation of parturient during cesarean delivery by thromboelastography.

Authors:  Mohammad Golparvar; Mehdi Esterabi; Reihanak Talakoub; Hamid Hajigholam Saryazdi
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2014-01

9.  Maternal morbidity and mortality from severe sepsis: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Colleen D Acosta; David A Harrison; Kathy Rowan; D Nuala Lucas; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Marian Knight
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.