Literature DB >> 1595686

Congenital defects and electric bed heating in New York State: a register-based case-control study.

L Dlugosz1, J Vena, T Byers, L Sever, M Bracken, E Marshall.   

Abstract

Exposure to 60-cycle electromagnetic fields has been hypothesized to be a cause of childhood cancer and congenital defects. Because electric bed heaters are a major source of variation in electromagnetic field exposure in the population, the authors conducted a case-control study in 1988-1989 to examine the relations between congenital defects and the use of electric blankets and heated waterbeds. Cases were identified by the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry as babies with cleft palate (n = 121), cleft lip with or without cleft palate (n = 197), born in 1983-1984, and anencephalus and spina bifida (n = 224), born in 1983-1986, all to upstate New York residents. Controls were selected at random from birth registrations individually matched to cases by maternal race, age, home county, month of last menses, and child's sex. Information on periconceptional electric blanket and heated waterbed use as well as known and suspected risk factors for defects was obtained from questionnaires mailed to the mothers. Matched odds ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for electric blanket use relative to nonuse were 0.8 (95% CI 0.3-2.1) for cleft palate, 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.3) for cleft lip, and 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.6) for neural tube defects. The respective odds ratios for heated waterbed use were nearly identical to these. Adjustment for potential confounding factors (maternal education, vitamin use, smoking) and stratification by season of conception and bed heat control setting had no meaningful effect on odds ratios. These results suggest that 60-cycle fields do not cause neural tube and oral cleft defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1595686     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  5 in total

1.  Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study.

Authors:  K G Blaasaas; T Tynes; A Irgens; R T Lie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Iatrogenic environmental hazards in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Thomas T Lai; Cynthia F Bearer
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 3.  EMFs: cutting through the controversy.

Authors:  D Wartenberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.

Authors:  I C Ahlbom; E Cardis; A Green; M Linet; D Savitz; A Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  A population-based case-control study of extreme summer temperature and birth defects.

Authors:  Alissa R Van Zutphen; Shao Lin; Barbara A Fletcher; Syni-An Hwang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.