Literature DB >> 15955906

Objective response to chemotherapy as a potential surrogate end point of survival in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Paolo Bruzzi1, Lucia Del Mastro, Maria P Sormani, Lars Bastholt, Marco Danova, Christian Focan, George Fountzilas, James Paul, Riccardo Rosso, Marco Venturini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of objective response to chemotherapy as a surrogate end point for survival in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis on individual data from 2,126 metastatic breast cancer patients who were enrolled onto 10 randomized trials comparing standard versus intensified epirubicin-containing chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The intensified chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher tumor response rate compared with standard chemotherapy (pooled odds ratio for nonresponse, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72). The intensified regimens also led to better (although not significant) survival (pooled odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.04; P = .22). Tumor response was a highly significant predictor of survival (P < .0001). When tumor response was introduced in the Cox model, the hazard ratio in favor of experimental treatment changed from 0.94 to 1.005 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.11; P = .92), indicating that no residual effect of the experimental treatment on survival was present once tumor response was adjusted for. This suggests that the overall survival benefit of intensified epirubicin was a result of the increase in response rate. The median survival time of patients with complete response and partial response was 28.8 months (95% CI, 25.4 to 45.3 months) and 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 22.4 months), respectively; whereas, the median survival time of patients with no response was 14.6 months (95% CI, 13.9 to 15.4 months).
CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that the achievement of an objective response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer is associated with a true survival benefit. The potential role of objective response as a surrogate end point for survival in chemotherapy trials of metastatic breast cancer warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15955906     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

Review 1.  [Implications of modern anticancer therapies for palliative care concepts].

Authors:  B Alt-Epping; F Nauck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Isabel Alvarez López; Juan de la Haba Rodríguez; Amparo Ruiz Simón; Meritxell Bellet Ezquerra; Lourdes Calvo Martínez; Laura García Estévez; Álvaro Rodríguez Lescure; Dolores Isla Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  A case of HER-2-positive advanced inflammatory breast cancer with invasive micropapillary component showing a clinically complete response to concurrent trastuzumab and paclitaxel treatment.

Authors:  Hideo Shigematsu; Yoshiaki Nakamura; Kimihiro Tanaka; Satoko Shiotani; Chinami Koga; Hidetoshi Kawaguchi; Sumiko Nishimura; Kenichi Taguchi; Kenichi Nishiyama; Shinji Ohno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 5.  Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Hinrich Wieder
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Song; Heenam Seo; Gyungjin Kim; Ah Rong Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Is Participation in Cancer Phase I Trials Really Therapeutic?

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Impact of the first tumor response at eight weeks on overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Lennart Blomqvist; Thomas Hatschek; Lena Carlsson; Zakaria Einbeigi; Barbro Linderholm; Birgitta Lindh; Niklas Loman; Martin Malmberg; Samuel Rotstein; Martin Söderberg; Marie Sundqvist; Thomas M Walz; Gunnar Aström; Hirofumi Fujii; Hans Jacobsson; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  In situ protein expression of RRM1, ERCC1, and BRCA1 in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Metro; Z Zheng; A Fabi; M Schell; B Antoniani; M Mottolese; A N Monteiro; P Vici; S Lara Rivera; D Boulware; F Cognetti; G Bepler
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Hubert H Chuang; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.