PURPOSE: To assess global left ventricular (LV) function and regional wall motion with retrospective electrocardiographically gated 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) in comparison with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 pigs (mean weight, 53.9 kg +/- 9.5 [standard deviation]), acute myocardial infarction was induced with balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery after approval was obtained from the committee on animal affairs. Thereafter, multi-detector row CT and MR imaging were performed with standardized examination protocols. From manually drawn endocardial and epicardial contours, LV volumes, including mean ejection fraction, peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejection rate (PER), time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR, were calculated. Regional wall motion was assessed from cine loops with a 16-segment model of the left ventricle. LV function was analyzed by using Bland-Altman plots, Student t test, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Regional wall motion scores were compared with weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: LV volumes determined with multi-detector row CT correlated well with MR imaging results, with an ejection fraction of 46.1% +/- 6.5 for multi-detector row CT and 46.8% +/- 5.9 for MR imaging (r = 0.97). PER, PFR, time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR showed a wide range of scattering and significant differences between multi-detector row CT and MR imaging for PER and time from end systole to PFR (P < .05). Regional wall motion scores showed a very high level of agreement with a kappa value of 0.88. CONCLUSION: Although 16-detector row CT allows reliable assessment of LV volumes and regional wall motion at rest, it is not suited for assessment of all functional parameters. Copyright RSNA, 2005
PURPOSE: To assess global left ventricular (LV) function and regional wall motion with retrospective electrocardiographically gated 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) in comparison with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 pigs (mean weight, 53.9 kg +/- 9.5 [standard deviation]), acute myocardial infarction was induced with balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery after approval was obtained from the committee on animal affairs. Thereafter, multi-detector row CT and MR imaging were performed with standardized examination protocols. From manually drawn endocardial and epicardial contours, LV volumes, including mean ejection fraction, peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejection rate (PER), time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR, were calculated. Regional wall motion was assessed from cine loops with a 16-segment model of the left ventricle. LV function was analyzed by using Bland-Altman plots, Student t test, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Regional wall motion scores were compared with weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: LV volumes determined with multi-detector row CT correlated well with MR imaging results, with an ejection fraction of 46.1% +/- 6.5 for multi-detector row CT and 46.8% +/- 5.9 for MR imaging (r = 0.97). PER, PFR, time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR showed a wide range of scattering and significant differences between multi-detector row CT and MR imaging for PER and time from end systole to PFR (P < .05). Regional wall motion scores showed a very high level of agreement with a kappa value of 0.88. CONCLUSION: Although 16-detector row CT allows reliable assessment of LV volumes and regional wall motion at rest, it is not suited for assessment of all functional parameters. Copyright RSNA, 2005
Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Christian Hohl; Joachim E Wildberger; Daniel Rinck; Thomas G Flohr; Ralf Koos; Christian Knackstedt; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Ralf Koos; Sven Stanzel; Petra Simone Busch; Mathias Niethammer; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: R Malagò; D Tavella; W Mantovani; M D'Onofrio; G Caliari; A Pezzato; L Nicolì; P Benussi; R Pozzi Mucelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: H Brodoefel; A Reimann; B Klumpp; M Fenchel; M Heuschmid; C Burgstahler; S Schroeder; S Miller; C D Claussen; A M Scheule; A F Kopp Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Han Wen; Keith A Marsolo; Eric E Bennett; Kwame S Kutten; Ryan P Lewis; David B Lipps; Neal D Epstein; Jonathan F Plehn; Pierre Croisille Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 11.105