Literature DB >> 15955861

Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging--study in pigs.

Andreas H Mahnken1, Marcus Katoh, Philipp Bruners, Elmar Spuentrup, Joachim E Wildberger, Rolf W Günther, Arno Buecker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess global left ventricular (LV) function and regional wall motion with retrospective electrocardiographically gated 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) in comparison with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 pigs (mean weight, 53.9 kg +/- 9.5 [standard deviation]), acute myocardial infarction was induced with balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery after approval was obtained from the committee on animal affairs. Thereafter, multi-detector row CT and MR imaging were performed with standardized examination protocols. From manually drawn endocardial and epicardial contours, LV volumes, including mean ejection fraction, peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejection rate (PER), time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR, were calculated. Regional wall motion was assessed from cine loops with a 16-segment model of the left ventricle. LV function was analyzed by using Bland-Altman plots, Student t test, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Regional wall motion scores were compared with weighted kappa statistic.
RESULTS: LV volumes determined with multi-detector row CT correlated well with MR imaging results, with an ejection fraction of 46.1% +/- 6.5 for multi-detector row CT and 46.8% +/- 5.9 for MR imaging (r = 0.97). PER, PFR, time to PER, and time from end systole to PFR showed a wide range of scattering and significant differences between multi-detector row CT and MR imaging for PER and time from end systole to PFR (P < .05). Regional wall motion scores showed a very high level of agreement with a kappa value of 0.88.
CONCLUSION: Although 16-detector row CT allows reliable assessment of LV volumes and regional wall motion at rest, it is not suited for assessment of all functional parameters. Copyright RSNA, 2005

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15955861     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm.

Authors:  Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Christian Hohl; Joachim E Wildberger; Daniel Rinck; Thomas G Flohr; Ralf Koos; Christian Knackstedt; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Ralf Koos; Sven Stanzel; Petra Simone Busch; Mathias Niethammer; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of regional left ventricular function with multidetector-row computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Left ventricular myocardial volumes measured during arterial and delayed phases of multidetector row computed tomography: a study on intra- and interobserver variability.

Authors:  I-Chen Tsai; Yu-Len Huang; Wan-Chun Liao; Kai-Hua Kao; Min-Chi Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  MDCT coronary angiography vs 2D echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricle functional parameters.

Authors:  R Malagò; D Tavella; W Mantovani; M D'Onofrio; G Caliari; A Pezzato; L Nicolì; P Benussi; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suchi Grover; Darryl P Leong; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Three-dimensional echocardiography in various types of heart disease: a comparison study of magnetic resonance imaging and 64-slice computed tomography in a real-world population.

Authors:  Angelo Squeri; Stefano Censi; Claudio Reverberi; Nicola Gaibazzi; Marco Baldelli; Simone Maurizio Binno; Enrico Properzi; Stefano Bosi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-09-02

9.  Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Brodoefel; A Reimann; B Klumpp; M Fenchel; M Heuschmid; C Burgstahler; S Schroeder; S Miller; C D Claussen; A M Scheule; A F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Adaptive postprocessing techniques for myocardial tissue tracking with displacement-encoded MR imaging.

Authors:  Han Wen; Keith A Marsolo; Eric E Bennett; Kwame S Kutten; Ryan P Lewis; David B Lipps; Neal D Epstein; Jonathan F Plehn; Pierre Croisille
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.