Literature DB >> 15955604

The focus group method: insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents.

Abbey Hyde1, Etaoine Howlett, Dympna Brady, Jonathan Drennan.   

Abstract

This article concerns the manner in which group interaction during focus groups impacted upon the data generated in a study of adolescent sexual health. Twenty-nine group interviews were conducted with secondary school pupils in Ireland, and data were subjected to a qualitative analysis. In exploring the relationship between method and theory generation, we begin by focusing on the ethnographic potential within group interviews. We propose that at times during the interviews, episodes of acting-out, or presenting a particular image in the presence of others, can be highly revealing in attempting to understand the normative rules embedded in the culture from which participants are drawn. However, we highlight a specific problem with distinguishing which parts of the group interview are a valid representation of group processes and which parts accurately reflect individuals' retrospective experiences of reality. We also note that at various points in the interview, focus groups have the potential to reveal participants' vulnerabilities. In addition, group members themselves can challenge one another on how aspects of their sub-culture are represented within the focus group, in a way that is normally beyond reach within individual interviews. The formation and composition of focus groups, particularly through the clustering of like-minded individuals, can affect the dominant views being expressed within specific groups. While focus groups have been noted to have an educational and transformative potential, we caution that they may also be a source of inaccurate information, placing participants at risk. Finally, the opportunities that focus groups offer in enabling researchers to cross-check the trustworthiness of data using a post-interview questionnaire are considered. We conclude by arguing that although far from flawless, focus groups are a valuable method for gathering data about health issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15955604     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  15 in total

1.  Informants a potential threat to confidentiality in small studies.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

2.  Patient-Physician Discussions on Lung Cancer Screening: A Missed Teachable Moment to Promote Smoking Cessation.

Authors:  Hasmeena Kathuria; Elisa Koppelman; Belinda Borrelli; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Karen E Lasser; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Recruiting low income and racially/ethnically diverse adolescents for focus groups.

Authors:  Melanie Sberna Hinojosa; Hajar Kadivar; Daniel Fernandez-Baca; TaJuana Chisholm; Lindsay A Thompson; Jevetta Stanford; Elizabeth Shenkman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

4.  Role clarification processes for better integration of nurse practitioners into primary healthcare teams: a multiple-case study.

Authors:  Isabelle Brault; Kelley Kilpatrick; Danielle D'Amour; Damien Contandriopoulos; Véronique Chouinard; Carl-Ardy Dubois; Mélanie Perroux; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  JACK trial protocol: a phase III multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based relationship and sexuality education intervention focusing on young male perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Lohan; Áine Aventin; Mike Clarke; Rhonda M Curran; Lisa Maguire; Rachael Hunter; Clíona McDowell; Lisa McDaid; Honor Young; James White; Adam Fletcher; Rebecca French; Christopher Bonell; Julia V Bailey; Liam O'Hare
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Sexual and reproductive health of Syrian refugee adolescent girls: a qualitative study using focus group discussions in an urban setting in Lebanon.

Authors:  Rayan Korri; Sabine Hess; Guenter Froeschl; Olena Ivanova
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Scanning for satisfaction or digging for dismay? Comparing findings from a postal survey with those from a focus group-study.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Claire Glenton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Symptoms of Mental Health Problems: Children's and Adolescents' Understandings and Implications for Gender Differences in Help Seeking.

Authors:  Alice MacLean; Kate Hunt; Helen Sweeting
Journal:  Child Soc       Date:  2013-05

9.  Feasibility trial of a film-based educational intervention for increasing boys' and girls' intentions to avoid teenage pregnancy: Study protocol.

Authors:  Maria Lohan; Aine Aventin; Lisa Maguire; Mike Clarke; Mark Linden; Lisa McDaid
Journal:  Int J Educ Res       Date:  2014

10.  Teenage recommendations to improve physical activity for their age group: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michaela James; Charlotte Todd; Samantha Scott; Gareth Stratton; Sarah McCoubrey; Danielle Christian; Julian Halcox; Suzanne Audrey; Elizabeth Ellins; Samantha Anderson; Isabel Copp; Sinead Brophy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.