Literature DB >> 15954844

Protein families and their evolution-a structural perspective.

Christine A Orengo1, Janet M Thornton.   

Abstract

We can now assign about two thirds of the sequences from completed genomes to as few as 1400 domain families for which structures are known and thus more ancient evolutionary relationships established. About 200 of these domain families are common to all kingdoms of life and account for nearly 50% of domain structure annotations in the genomes. Some of these domain families have been very extensively duplicated within a genome and combined with different domain partners giving rise to different multidomain proteins. The ways in which these domain combinations evolve tend to be specific to the organism so that less than 15% of the protein families found within a genome appear to be common to all kingdoms of life. Recent analyses of completed genomes, exploiting the structural data, have revealed the extent to which duplication of these domains and modifications of their functions can expand the functional repertoire of the organism, contributing to increasing complexity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15954844     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem        ISSN: 0066-4154            Impact factor:   23.643


  110 in total

1.  Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.

Authors:  Rayan Chikhi; Lee Sael; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

2.  Structure and mutagenesis studies of the C-terminal region of licensing factor Cdt1 enable the identification of key residues for binding to replicative helicase Mcm proteins.

Authors:  Jungoo Jee; Takeshi Mizuno; Katsuhiko Kamada; Hidehito Tochio; Yasumasa Chiba; Ken-Ichiro Yanagi; Gentaro Yasuda; Hidekazu Hiroaki; Fumio Hanaoka; Masahiro Shirakawa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Ancient evolutionary origin of diversified variable regions demonstrated by crystal structures of an immune-type receptor in amphioxus.

Authors:  José A Hernández Prada; Robert N Haire; Marc Allaire; Jean Jakoncic; Vivian Stojanoff; John P Cannon; Gary W Litman; David A Ostrov
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-06-25       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Census of prokaryotic senses.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Structural genomics: keeping up with expanding knowledge of the protein universe.

Authors:  Marek Grabowski; Andrzej Joachimiak; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Wladek Minor
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  Exploiting protein structure data to explore the evolution of protein function and biological complexity.

Authors:  Russell L Marsden; Juan A G Ranea; Antonio Sillero; Oliver Redfern; Corin Yeats; Michael Maibaum; David Lee; Sarah Addou; Gabrielle A Reeves; Timothy J Dallman; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Basu; Liran Carmel; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Compressing proteomes: the relevance of medium range correlations.

Authors:  Dario Benedetto; Emanuele Caglioti; Claudia Chica
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Iron-sulfur protein folds, iron-sulfur chemistry, and evolution.

Authors:  Jacques Meyer
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 10.  Functional diversity of ankyrin repeats in microbial proteins.

Authors:  Souhaila Al-Khodor; Christopher T Price; Awdhesh Kalia; Yousef Abu Kwaik
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 17.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.