OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of a newly developed extraoral TACT system for diagnosing impacted third molars. STUDY DESIGN: Three dry human mandibles with impacted third molars were used. Nine base images were obtained by the extraoral and intraoral TACT methods. Four board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated TACT slice images as to whether the TACT images could clearly show the periodontal space of the impacted third molar, and the location of the tooth relative to the second molar, or to the mandibular canal. The criteria were excellent, good, fair, poor, and unreadable. RESULTS: Only the visibility of the periodontal space in extraoral TACT was significantly inferior to that of intraoral TACT. Almost all of the series of TACT images, however, were graded as excellent or good. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that extraoral TACT is a useful modality for the clinical assessment of impacted third molars.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of a newly developed extraoral TACT system for diagnosing impacted third molars. STUDY DESIGN: Three dry human mandibles with impacted third molars were used. Nine base images were obtained by the extraoral and intraoral TACT methods. Four board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated TACT slice images as to whether the TACT images could clearly show the periodontal space of the impacted third molar, and the location of the tooth relative to the second molar, or to the mandibular canal. The criteria were excellent, good, fair, poor, and unreadable. RESULTS: Only the visibility of the periodontal space in extraoral TACT was significantly inferior to that of intraoral TACT. Almost all of the series of TACT images, however, were graded as excellent or good. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that extraoral TACT is a useful modality for the clinical assessment of impacted third molars.
Authors: Christina R Inscoe; Enrique Platin; Sally M Mauriello; Angela Broome; Andre Mol; Laurence R Gaalaas; Michael W Regan Anderson; Connor Puett; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 4.071