Literature DB >> 15949783

What is the most cost-effective treatment for patients with low back pain? A systematic review.

Nicole van der Roer1, Mariëlle E J B Goossens, Silvia M A A Evers, Maurits W van Tulder.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations of the various interventions available for low back pain will help clinicians and policymakers to identify the most beneficial treatment. This chapter aims to evaluate the most cost-effective treatments for patients with non-specific low back pain. Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane library were used to search for articles published from 1966 to July 2004 using a variety of keywords. References were checked to identify additional studies. The consensus health economic criteria (CHEC) list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. We found 17 studies; six of these concluded that the intervention of interest was superior to the control intervention. However, definite conclusions about the most cost-effective intervention could not be drawn because of the heterogeneity of interventions, controls and study populations. More high-quality economic evaluations are needed before such a conclusion can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15949783     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Efficacy, utility and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment for chronic low back pain].

Authors:  C Rolli Salathé; A Elfering; M Melloh
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Intervertebral disc, sensory nerves and neurotrophins: who is who in discogenic pain?

Authors:  José García-Cosamalón; Miguel E del Valle; Marta G Calavia; Olivia García-Suárez; Alfonso López-Muñiz; Jesús Otero; José A Vega
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Bart W Koes; Maurits van Tulder; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Luciana G Macedo; James McAuley; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders.

Authors:  Nicole van der Roer; Norbert Boos; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A cost-consequences analysis of the effect of pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain in routine medical practice in primary care settings.

Authors:  Ana Navarro; María T Saldaña; Concepción Pérez; Sandra Torrades; Javier Rejas
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Marion Haas; Chris G Maher; Luciana A C Machado; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of general practice care for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Marion Haas; Chris G Maher; Luciana A C Machado; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does physical activity change predict functional recovery in low back pain? Protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Hendrick; Stephan Milosavljevic; Melanie L Bell; Leigh Hale; Deirdre A Hurley; Suzanne M McDonough; Markus Melloh; David G Baxter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Beth L Poindexter; Claudia M Witt; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Nicole van der Roer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Maurits W van Tulder; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Wim A B Stalman; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.