Literature DB >> 16320029

Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders.

Nicole van der Roer1, Norbert Boos, Maurits W van Tulder.   

Abstract

The number of economic evaluations in the field of spinal disorders and methodological studies have increased in the last decade. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of current views on economic evaluations in the field of spinal disorders and to facilitate clinicians to interpret and use results from these studies. A full economic evaluation compares both costs and effects of two or more interventions. Key elements of economic evaluations such as identifying adequate alternatives, analytical perspective, cost methodology, missing values and sensitivity analyses are addressed. Further emphasis is placed on the interpretation of results of economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised clinical trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, cost-effectiveness planes, acceptability curves and cost-effectiveness thresholds are discussed. The contents may aid in taking the efficacy 'hurdle' in the field of spinal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320029      PMCID: PMC3454548          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1052-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  46 in total

Review 1.  The death of cost-minimization analysis?

Authors:  A H Briggs; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap.

Authors:  J A Barber; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard.

Authors:  R A Hirth; M E Chernew; E Miller; A M Fendrick; W G Weissert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Affordability and cost-effectiveness: decision-making on the cost-effectiveness plane.

Authors:  P P Sendi; A H Briggs
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Discounting for health effects in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  H Gravelle; D Smith
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Bernie J O'Brien; Gordon Blackhouse
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Marc A Koopmanschap; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Damian Walker; Rosalind Raine; Andrew Hutchings; Jennifer A Roberts
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Joan Llobera; Victor Abraira; Pablo Lázaro; Francisco Pozo; David Kleinbaum
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  M E Goossens; M P Rutten-van Mölken; J W Vlaeyen; S M van der Linden
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice.

Authors:  Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ludeke C Lambeek; Judith E Bosmans; Barend J Van Royen; Maurits W Van Tulder; Willem Van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-30

3.  Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Aryan Behechtnejad; Alexander Ouchmaev; Matthias Morfeld; Karin Schermelleh-Engel; Michael Amling; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  The impact of economic evaluation on quality management in spine surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery.

Authors:  Lutfi Al-Khouja; Faris Shweikeh; Robert Pashman; J Patrick Johnson; Terrence T Kim; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-06-25

6.  Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Nicole van der Roer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Maurits W van Tulder; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Wim A B Stalman; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.