Literature DB >> 15948779

Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Yog Raj Sharma1, Sathiyan Karunanithi, Raj Vardhan Azad, Rajpal Vohra, Nikhil Pal, Deependra Vikram Singh, Parijat Chandra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To conduct a randomized prospective clinical trial to compare primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling versus conventional scleral buckling surgery in pseudophakic primary retinal detachment (PPRD) in terms of anatomic attachment rate, functional outcome and complications.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive eyes of 50 patients with PPRD were randomized into two groups, with 25 patients in each of group 1 (scleral buckling group) and group 2 (pars plana vitrectomy without buckling group) in a hospital setting and followed up at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months.
RESULTS: A primary reattachment rate of 76% (19 retinas) was obtained in group 1, while a reattachment rate of 84% (21 retinas) was achieved in group 2. The final anatomic reattachment rate was 100% in both groups. The causes of failure in group 1 were proliferative vitreoretinopathy in five eyes and open break/missed break in one eye. The causes of failure in group 2 were missed break/open break in three eyes and proliferative vitreoretinopathy in one eye. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 2 weeks was better in group 1, while the final BCVA at end of 6 months was two lines better in group 2. The mean change in refractive error was -- 1.38 D in group 1 and -- 0.85 D in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy without buckling provides an effective treatment for PPRD and results in better longterm visual and anatomic outcomes than conventional scleral buckling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15948779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  40 in total

1.  Comparative study of 23-gauge vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Magali Albrieux; Frédéric Rouberol; Diane Bernheim; Jean-Paul Romanet; Christophe Chiquet
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Primary pars plana vitrectomy. Techniques, indications, and results].

Authors:  H Heimann; K-U Bartz-Schmidt; N Bornfeld; C Weiss; R-D Hilgers; M H Foerster
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Masataka Koriyama; Tetsuya Nishimura; Takashi Matsubara; Makoto Taomoto; Kanji Takahashi; Miyo Matsumura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6.

Authors:  Nicole Heussen; Nicolas Feltgen; Peter Walter; Hans Hoerauf; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Heinrich Heimann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency.

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with subretinal proliferation.

Authors:  K Ghasemi Falavarjani; S A Alemzadeh; M Modarres; M M Parvaresh; M Hashemi; M Naseripour; H Nazari Khanamiri; S Askari
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  One-year outcomes after retinal detachment surgery among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shelley Day; Daniel S Grossman; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Frank A Sloan; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone.

Authors:  Rivka Kessner; Adiel Barak
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Retinal detachment.

Authors:  David Steel
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-03-03

Review 10.  Retinal detachment.

Authors:  David Steel; Scott Fraser
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.