Literature DB >> 21305315

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6.

Nicole Heussen1, Nicolas Feltgen, Peter Walter, Hans Hoerauf, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Heinrich Heimann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 1 year after initial surgery following primary vitrectomy (PV) and scleral buckling surgery (SB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
METHODS: Relating the final BCVA at the 1-year follow-up visit to pre- and intraoperative findings in the "randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy for repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" (SPR Study) using multivariate statistical methods.
RESULTS: In the phakic subtrial, final BCVA is associated with the number of breaks (p = 0.0259), duration of symptoms (p = 0.0476), baseline BCVA (p = 0.0002), retinal detachment central to major vessels arcades (p = 0.0088), total detachment (p = 0.0027), and chain formation of breaks (p = 0.0129). In the pseudophakic/aphakic subtrial, final BCVA is related to the number of retinal breaks (p = 0.0010), secondary cataract or central capsular fibrosis (p = 0.0141), intraoperative laser photocoagulation (p = 0.0373), and inferior detachment with breaks below the 4 and 8 o'clock positions (p = 0.0173).
CONCLUSION: Final BCVA is the most important outcome for patients undergoing RRD surgery. Our results demonstrate that the final BCVA is related to a higher preoperative number of breaks in both subtrials. Additional risk factors varied between phakic and pseudophakic subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305315     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1619-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation--report no. 1.

Authors:  Hamid Ahmadieh; Siamak Moradian; Hooshang Faghihi; Mohammad M Parvaresh; Heshmatollah Ghanbari; Morsal Mehryar; Ebadollah Heidari; Hasan Behboudi; Touka Banaee; Banafsheh Golestan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments.

Authors:  S Kusaka; A Toshino; Y Ohashi; E Sakaue
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adarsh V Arya; John W Emerson; Michael Engelbert; Curtis L Hagedorn; Ron A Adelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula.

Authors:  T C Burton
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1982

5.  A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  T C Burton; R W Lambert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Carsten H Meyer; Stefan Mennel; Steffen Hoerle; Peter Kroll
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Macula off retinal detachments. How long can they wait before it is too late?

Authors:  L Mowatt; G A Shun-Shin; S Arora; N Price
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached.

Authors:  P Tani; D M Robertson; A Langworthy
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling.

Authors:  W S Grizzard; G F Hilton; M E Hammer; D Taren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  Päivi Ranta; Tero Kivelä
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency.

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Preoperative factors to select vitrectomy or scleral buckling for retinal detachment in microincision vitrectomy era.

Authors:  Koichi Nishitsuka; Ryo Kawasaki; Keita Yamakiri; Takayuki Baba; Takashi Koto; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Predictive factors for postoperative visual function of primary chronic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after scleral buckling.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Jiu-Ke Li; Xiao-Hong Jin; Yuan-Min Dai; Yu-Min Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.

Authors:  Ljubo Znaor; Aleksej Medic; Susanne Binder; Ana Vucinovic; Josipa Marin Lovric; Livia Puljak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-08

5.  Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in elderly people over 70 years old: visual acuity, quality of life, and cost-utility values.

Authors:  Yingyan Ma; Xiaohua Ying; Haidong Zou; Xiaocheng Xu; Haiyun Liu; Lin Bai; Xun Xu; Xi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracy of deep learning, a machine-learning technology, using ultra-wide-field fundus ophthalmoscopy for detecting rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Hideharu Ohsugi; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Hiroki Enno; Naofumi Ishitobi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using noncontact wide-angle viewing system with a cannula-based 25 G chandelier endoilluminator.

Authors:  Hisanori Imai; Mizuki Tagami; Atsushi Azumi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-11

8.  Variations in Functional and Anatomical Outcomes and in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Rate along a Prospective Collaborative Study on Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments: The Retina 1 Project-Report 4.

Authors:  J Carlos Pastor; Itziar Fernández; Rosa M Coco; María R Sanabria; Enrique Rodríguez de la Rúa; Rosa M Piñon; Vicente Martinez; Anna Sala-Puigdollers; José M Gallardo; Sara Velilla
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-08

9.  Scleral Buckling for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Associated with Pars Planitis.

Authors:  Yong-Kyu Kim; Wontae Yoon; Jae Kyoun Ahn; Sung Pyo Park
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks postoperative prone positioning results: 1 day versus 7 days.

Authors:  Radwan Ajlan; Jordan Isenberg; Ghassan Cordahi; Renaud Duval; Sébastien Olivier; Flavio Rezende
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2017-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.