Literature DB >> 15948443

Alternative bearing surfaces: alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty.

William N Capello1, James A Dantonio, Judy R Feinberg, Michael T Manley.   

Abstract

Osteolysis resulting from polyethylene wear debris is one of the most common causes of implant failure in young, active individuals who undergo total hip arthroplasty. Reducing wear may help extend the life of the implant in these patients. Contemporary alumina ceramic/alumina ceramic bearing articulations are harder, scratch resistant, and more hydrophilic than other bearing couples, resulting in reduced wear and reduction of particle load to the surrounding tissue. Therefore, bearings made of alumina ceramic may be a preferable bearing choice for younger, more active patients. To investigate this hypothesis, 495 patients (514 hips), average age 53 years, were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing an alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing to a cobalt-chromium-on-polyethylene bearing control. At an average of 4 years after implantation, no difference in clinical outcome was observed between groups. There were no fractures of the ceramic head or liner, nor were there any revisions caused by the ceramic liner. Another investigational group was added to the study 1 year after enrollment in the original study was closed. The same inclusion/exclusion criteria were used. A total of 194 consecutive patients (209 hips) received an alumina liner that included a thin metal backing designed to allow bearing replacement and ease surgical assembly. At an averagefollow-up of 30 months, no liner or head chips or fractures were observed in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15948443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  6 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of ceramic-on-ceramic implants in stemmed hip replacement: a multinational study of six national and regional registries.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Stephen Graves; Barbara Bordini; Miquel Pons; Leif Havelin; Susan Mehle; Elizabeth Paxton; Thomas Barber; Guy Cafri
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The central role of wear debris in periprosthetic osteolysis.

Authors:  P Edward Purdue; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Bryan J Nestor; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Comparative assessment of implantable hip devices with different bearing surfaces: systematic appraisal of evidence.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Stefan Dabic; Samantha Jacobs; Stephen Graves; Danica Marinac-Dabic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-29

4.  Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic to metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dongcai Hu; Kai Tie; Xiao Yang; Yang Tan; Mohammed Alaidaros; Liaobin Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Midterm Results of Fourth-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyu-Jin Cho; Kyung-Soon Park; Won-Young Jang; Chun-Gon Park; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Letter to the editor re: Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials: Bednarska E, Bryant D, Devereaux, PJ. Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1734-1744.

Authors:  David J Biau; Raphael Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.