Literature DB >> 15947929

Correlation of pharmacokinetics with the antitumor activity of Cetuximab in nude mice bearing the GEO human colon carcinoma xenograft.

F R Luo1, Z Yang, H Dong, A Camuso, K McGlinchey, K Fager, C Flefleh, D Kan, I Inigo, S Castaneda, W C Rose, R A Kramer, R Wild, F Y Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a protein tyrosine kinase expressed in many types of human cancers including colon and breast, has been strongly associated with tumor progression. Cetuximab, an IgG1 anti-EGFR chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody, has been proven to be effective in the treatment of advanced colon cancer. To date, there has not been a study to systematically evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Cetuximab in a preclinical model and to further explore any correlation of drug exposure between animal models and cancer patients. In the present study, we characterized the PK of Cetuximab in nude mice at efficacious dose levels and further compared the preclinical optimal dose and active plasma drug concentration with those determined in clinical studies. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The antitumor activity of Cetuximab was evaluated using the GEO human colon carcinoma xenografts implanted subcutaneously in nude mice. The drug was administered ip every 3 days for five total injections (inj) (q3dx5) at dose levels ranging from 1 mg/inj to 0.04 mg/inj. The plasma PK of Cetuximab was determined at dose levels of 1.0, 0.25, and 0.04 mg/inj with a single bolus iv or ip administration in nude mice. The tumoral PK of Cetuximab was determined at dose levels of 0.25, and 0.04 mg/inj with a single bolus ip administration in nude mice bearing GEO tumor xenografts. The plasma and tumoral levels of Cetuximab were quantitated by an ELISA assay.
RESULTS: Cetuximab demonstrated a dose-dependent antitumor activity at dose levels of 0.25, 0.1, and 0.04 mg/inj, with a statistically significant tumor growth delay (in reaching a tumor target size of 1 gm) of 18 days (P < 0.001), 12.3 days (P < 0.01), and 10 days (P < 0.01) for 0.25, 0.1, and 0.04 mg/inj, respectively. A separate study employing the same treatment schedule showed that Cetuximab was equally active at dose levels ranging from 0.25 mg/inj to 1 mg/inj. Therefore, dose levels of Cetuximab from 1 mg/inj to 0.04 mg/inj can be considered to be within the efficacious range, while dose levels of 0.25 mg/inj or higher appeared to be optimal for the antitumor activity of Cetuximab in the GEO tumor model. When Cetuximab was given iv to mice, the elimination half life (t(1/2)) was 39.6, 37.8, and 42.2 h for doses of 1.0, 0.25, and 0.04 mg/inj, respectively, suggesting a similar disposition kinetics of Cetuximab within this dose range. The volume of distribution (V(d)) ranged from 0.062 l/kg to 0.070 l/kg, suggesting that Cetuximab is primarily confined to the plasma compartment with limited peripheral tissue distribution. Clearance (CL) was similar and no apparent PK saturation was observed across the dose ranging from 0.04 mg/inj to 1.0 mg/inj. When mice were administered with a single bolus ip administration at doses of 1, 0.25, and 0.04 mg/inj, the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) was 407.6, 66.4, and 16.5 microg/ml. The area under the curve of plasma drug concentration (AUC) was 19212.4, 3182.4, and 534.5 microg/ml h, for 1.0, 0.25, and 0.04 mg/inj, respectively. The average steady state plasma concentration (C(ss avg)) for the multiple dosing schedule was estimated to be 73.1 microg/ml at 0.25 mg/inj and was considered as an active plasma drug concentration. The maximum tumoral concentration of Cetuximab was 2.6 and 0.53 ng/mg-tumor while the tumoral drug exposure was 112.6 and 18.3 ng/mg h for 0.25 and 0.04 mg/inj, respectively. The EGFR was estimated to be nearly completely occupied by Cetuximab at the optimal dose of 0.25 mg/inj.
CONCLUSION: In the present study, we compared the preclinical optimal dose and the corresponding active plasma concentration determined in mice with those being observed in cancer patients, i.e. 65-100 microg/ml. The preclinical optimal dose of 0.25 mg/inj was significantly lower than the current clinical dose. However, the active plasma concentration at 0.25 mg/inj is within the range of the active drug concentrations in cancer patients treated with Cetuximab under the current optimal dosing regimen. It appears that the active plasma drug concentration determined in preclinical model predicts better than the optimal preclinical dose for the clinical development of antibody drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15947929     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-005-1022-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  25 in total

1.  Maximizing tumour exposure to anti-neuropilin-1 antibody requires saturation of non-tumour tissue antigenic sinks in mice.

Authors:  Daniela Bumbaca; Hong Xiang; C Andrew Boswell; Ruediger E Port; Shannon L Stainton; Eduardo E Mundo; Sheila Ulufatu; Anil Bagri; Frank-Peter Theil; Paul J Fielder; Leslie A Khawli; Ben-Quan Shen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Concordance of preclinical and clinical pharmacology and toxicology of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins: cell surface targets.

Authors:  Peter J Bugelski; Pauline L Martin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Cetuximab: preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR for radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic applications.

Authors:  Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Geoffrey L Ray; Kayhan Garmestani; Mark Williams; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.099

4.  Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tissue distribution, and tumor penetration of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Authors:  Rong Deng; Daniela Bumbaca; Cinthia V Pastuskovas; C Andrew Boswell; David West; Kyra J Cowan; Henry Chiu; Jacqueline McBride; Clarissa Johnson; Yan Xin; Hartmut Koeppen; Maya Leabman; Suhasini Iyer
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Tumor Priming by SMO Inhibition Enhances Antibody Delivery and Efficacy in a Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Model.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Darren K W Chan; Arindam Sen; Wen Wee Ma; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Iain Gardner; Brian M Gurbaxani; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Relevance of MET activation and genetic alterations of KRAS and E-cadherin for cetuximab sensitivity of gastric cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Stefan Heindl; Evelyn Eggenstein; Simone Keller; Julia Kneissl; Gisela Keller; Kathrin Mutze; Sandra Rauser; Georg Gasteiger; Ingo Drexler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Heinz Höfler; Birgit Luber
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  The distribution of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and trastuzumab within solid tumors.

Authors:  Carol M Lee; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  An A13 repeat within the 3'-untranslated region of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently mutated in microsatellite instability colon cancers and is associated with increased EGFR expression.

Authors:  Ziqiang Yuan; Joongho Shin; Andrew Wilson; Sanjay Goel; Yi-He Ling; Naseem Ahmed; Higinio Dopeso; Minaxi Jhawer; Shannon Nasser; Cristina Montagna; Kenneth Fordyce; Leonard H Augenlicht; Lauri A Aaltonen; Diego Arango; Thomas K Weber; John M Mariadason
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab.

Authors:  Minaxi Jhawer; Sanjay Goel; Andrew J Wilson; Cristina Montagna; Yi-He Ling; Do-Sun Byun; Shannon Nasser; Diego Arango; Joongho Shin; Lidija Klampfer; Leonard H Augenlicht; Roman Perez-Soler; Roman Perez Soler; John M Mariadason
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.