BACKGROUND: This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of stereoscopic digital photography of the retina through a dilated pupil with a 45 degrees nonmydriatic camera and Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compression of the images with the sensitivity and specificity of 35-mm slide film photography in the identification of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AMD were enrolled. Stereoscopic retinal images of the disc, macula and temporal macula were captured with a digital 45 degrees nonmydriatic camera (then compressed into JPEG format) and with a standard fundus camera and slide film. A single retinal specialist graded both image formats in masked fashion, at least 1 month apart, using a modified Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) severity scale. The digital images were displayed on a monitor and viewed with the use of liquid crystal display shutter glasses and stereo imaging software. The film images were mounted on a light box and graded with the use of a stereoviewer. Primary outcome measures included the presence or absence of AMD pathological features. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), sensitivity, specificity and weighted kappaw statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We photographed 203 eyes (of 103 patients) with both digital and slide film cameras. Correlation of the 2 image formats was substantial in identifying AREDS level 3a or greater (kappaw=0.64, standard error=0.08, PPV=0.95, NPV=0.66, sensitivity=0.93, specificity=0.74) and excellent in identifying level 4b or greater (kappaw=0.83, standard error=0.05, PPV=0.81, NPV=0.98, sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.94). INTERPRETATION: High-resolution stereoscopic, mydriatic, 45 degrees digital images captured with a nonmydriatic camera and JPEG compressed correlate well with stereoscopic slide film photographs in the identification of moderate to advanced AMD (AREDS level 3a or greater).
BACKGROUND: This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of stereoscopic digital photography of the retina through a dilated pupil with a 45 degrees nonmydriatic camera and Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compression of the images with the sensitivity and specificity of 35-mm slide film photography in the identification of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AMD were enrolled. Stereoscopic retinal images of the disc, macula and temporal macula were captured with a digital 45 degrees nonmydriatic camera (then compressed into JPEG format) and with a standard fundus camera and slide film. A single retinal specialist graded both image formats in masked fashion, at least 1 month apart, using a modified Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) severity scale. The digital images were displayed on a monitor and viewed with the use of liquid crystal display shutter glasses and stereo imaging software. The film images were mounted on a light box and graded with the use of a stereoviewer. Primary outcome measures included the presence or absence of AMD pathological features. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), sensitivity, specificity and weighted kappaw statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We photographed 203 eyes (of 103 patients) with both digital and slide film cameras. Correlation of the 2 image formats was substantial in identifying AREDS level 3a or greater (kappaw=0.64, standard error=0.08, PPV=0.95, NPV=0.66, sensitivity=0.93, specificity=0.74) and excellent in identifying level 4b or greater (kappaw=0.83, standard error=0.05, PPV=0.81, NPV=0.98, sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.94). INTERPRETATION: High-resolution stereoscopic, mydriatic, 45 degrees digital images captured with a nonmydriatic camera and JPEG compressed correlate well with stereoscopic slide film photographs in the identification of moderate to advanced AMD (AREDS level 3a or greater).
Authors: Sapna Gangaputra; Jeong Won Pak; Qian Peng; Larry D Hubbard; Dennis Thayer; Zbigniew Krason; Jeff Joyce; Ronald P Danis Journal: Retina Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Edem Tsikata; Inês Laíns; João Gil; Marco Marques; Kelsey Brown; Tânia Mesquita; Pedro Melo; Maria da Luz Cachulo; Ivana K Kim; Demetrios Vavvas; Joaquim N Murta; John B Miller; Rufino Silva; Joan W Miller; Teresa C Chen; Deeba Husain Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 3.283