Literature DB >> 15947232

Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance.

Balvinder Khambay1, Declan Millett, Siobhan McHugh.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine the mean tensile force of four different elastomeric modules, the archwire seating force of different ligation methods, and its effect on frictional resistance. To determine the mean tensile force, each elastomeric module (purple, grey, Alastik, and SuperSlick) was extended by 5 mm using two hooks attached to a load cell using a Nene M3000 testing machine. To assess the median archwire seating force, a maxillary premolar bracket (3M Unitek) was welded to a sheet of stainless steel (SS) and glued to a Perspex block. The bracket base was removed and the cut continued into the Perspex below. A length of test wire was taken and bent to form a "U" shape, with the middle portion 20 mm in length. The free ends of the wire were secured to the load cell of the Nene testing machine. Two wire sizes were tested, 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS. The load cell was activated and the force with which the wire was displaced into the slot by the ligation method was measured. Four types of elastomeric module were tested together with a pre-formed 0.09 inch SS ligature. The experimental method used to determine the mean frictional force of each module and wire size was carried out using a method described previously. Statistically significant differences existed in the mean tensile forces and median archwire seating forces between the elastomeric modules. Grey modules with either size wire produced the lowest median archwire seating force, whereas SS ligatures produced the highest forces. SS ligatures with either wire produced the lowest mean frictional forces, whereas grey modules produced significantly higher mean frictional force (P < 0.01). The force with which the wire was seated into the bracket did not seem to be related to the subsequent amount of mean frictional force produced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15947232     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Traditional elastic ligatures versus slide ligation system. A morphological evaluation.

Authors:  R Condò; A Casaglia; E Armellin; S G Condò; L Cerroni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-07-15

2.  The Effect of Ligature Type on Lateral Tooth Movement during Orthodontic Treatment with Lingual Appliances-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Reichardt; Steffen Decker; Michel Dalstra; Prasad Nalabothu; Markus Steineck; Leandro Fernandez; Carlalberta Verna
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.

Authors:  Simona Tecco; Donato Di Iorio; Riccardo Nucera; Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Giancarlo Cordasco; Felice Festa
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-07

4.  In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  S Lalithapriya; N Kurunji Kumaran; K Rajasigamani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Metals and Metalloids Release from Orthodontic Elastomeric and Stainless Steel Ligatures: In Vitro Risk Assessment of Human Exposure.

Authors:  Aneta Olszewska; Anetta Hanć; Danuta Barałkiewicz; Piotr Rzymski
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method.

Authors:  Sandra-Liliana Gómez-Gómez; Natalia Sánchez-Obando; María-Antonia Álvarez-Castrillón; Yesid Montoya-Goez; Carlos M Ardila
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-05-01

7.  Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Choi; Da-Young Kang; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment.

Authors:  Giancarlo Cordasco; Antonino Lo Giudice; Angela Militi; Riccardo Nucera; Giuseppe Triolo; Giovanni Matarese
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  A comparative evaluation of static frictional resistance using various methods of ligation at different time intervals: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Amanpreet Singh Natt; Amandeep Kaur Sekhon; Sudhir Munjal; Rohit Duggal; Anup Holla; Prahlad Gupta; Piyush Gandhi; Sahil Sarin
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.