Literature DB >> 15943556

Gender differences in attitudes among those at risk for Huntington's disease.

Sandra Taylor1.   

Abstract

This report presents and discusses selected findings regarding gender differences from an Australian-based study that investigated attitudes of individuals at risk for Huntington's disease (HD) towards genetic risk and predictive testing. Clear gender differences emerged regarding perceived coping capacity with regard to predictive testing, as well as disclosure of the genetic risk for HD to others. Female participants were more likely to disclose their genetic risk to others, including their medical practitioners, while male participants were three times more fearful of disclosing their genetic risk to others. These findings are of interest in light of gender differences that have consistently been reported regarding the uptake of predictive testing for HD, other genetic conditions, and health services more generally. While gender differences cannot provide a fully explanatory framework for differential uptake of predictive genetic testing, men and women may experience and respond differently to the genetic risk for HD and possibly other inherited disorders. The meanings of genetic risk to men and women warrants further exploration, given anticipated increases in genetic testing for more common conditions, especially if post-test interventions are possible. These issues are also relevant within the context of individuals' concerns about the potential for discrimination on the basis of genetic risk or genetic test information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943556     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2005.9.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  13 in total

1.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Personal factors associated with reported benefits of Huntington disease family history or genetic testing.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Cheryl Erwin; Andrew Juhl; James Mills; Bradley Brossman; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Neurodegenerative disease. Genetic discrimination in Huntington disease.

Authors:  Stefan M Pulst
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

5.  22 Years of predictive testing for Huntington's disease: the experience of the UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium.

Authors:  Sheharyar S Baig; Mark Strong; Elisabeth Rosser; Nicola V Taverner; Ruth Glew; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Angus Clarke; David Craufurd; Oliver W Quarrell
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Prospective Evaluation of Predictive DNA Testing for Huntington's Disease in a Large German Center.

Authors:  Aysegül Ibisler; Sebastian Ocklenburg; Susanne Stemmler; Larissa Arning; Jörg T Epplen; Carsten Saft; Sabine Hoffjan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

8.  Two decades of Huntington disease testing: patient's demographics and reproductive choices.

Authors:  Rebekah C Krukenberg; Daniel L Koller; David D Weaver; Jennifer N Dickerson; Kimberly A Quaid
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: implications for counseling.

Authors:  Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  A review of quality of life after predictive testing for and earlier identification of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Jane S Paulsen; Martha Nance; Ji-In Kim; Noelle E Carlozzi; Peter K Panegyres; Cheryl Erwin; Anita Goh; Elizabeth McCusker; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.