Literature DB >> 28361381

Prospective Evaluation of Predictive DNA Testing for Huntington's Disease in a Large German Center.

Aysegül Ibisler1,2, Sebastian Ocklenburg3, Susanne Stemmler4,5, Larissa Arning4,5, Jörg T Epplen4,5,6, Carsten Saft5,7, Sabine Hoffjan4,5.   

Abstract

We present a prospective study of counselees seeking predictive testing for Huntington's disease at the Huntington Center North Rhine-Westphalia (Bochum, Germany) between 2010 and 2012. The aim was to observe the decision-making process of at-risk individuals and explore their experiences following the decision as well as the impacts of positive and negative mutation results. Data were collected using two standardized questionnaires as well as via a semi-standardized telephone interview one year after the initial counseling session. Seventy-two  individuals participated in at least one of the three phases of the survey, including 31 individuals in the telephone interview. Sociodemographic data were in accordance with previous reports. The process of predictive testing was generally perceived in a positive manner, with almost all interviewees reporting a balanced emotional state one year after initial counseling, regardless of the decision for or against the test. The most important reasons named in favor of or against testing were assembled as well as different aspects regarding the satisfaction with the reached decision. In line with and expanding previous observations on gender-related differences in decision-making, our results suggest that gender-related aspects should be more strongly taken into account in genetic counseling during the predictive testing and counseling processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Gender differences; Genetic counseling; Huntington’s disease; Motivation; Predictive testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28361381     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  34 in total

1.  Personal factors associated with reported benefits of Huntington disease family history or genetic testing.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Cheryl Erwin; Andrew Juhl; James Mills; Bradley Brossman; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-08-19

2.  Impact of Huntington Disease Gene-Positive Status on Pre-Symptomatic Young Adults and Recommendations for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Joanna H Fanos; Lauren Korty; Carly E Siskind; Andrea K Hanson-Kahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Doing the right thing for one's children: deciding whether to take the genetic test for Huntington's disease as a moral dilemma.

Authors:  J A Smith; M Stephenson; C Jacobs; O Quarrell
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  In their own words: reports of stigma and genetic discrimination by people at risk for Huntington disease in the International RESPOND-HD study.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Cheryl Erwin; Andrew R Juhl; Michelle Mengeling; Yvonne Bombard; Michael R Hayden; Kimberly Quaid; Ira Shoulson; Sandra Taylor; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: the international RESPOND-HD study.

Authors:  Cheryl Erwin; Janet K Williams; Andrew R Juhl; Michelle Mengeling; James A Mills; Yvonne Bombard; Michael R Hayden; Kimberly Quaid; Ira Shoulson; Sandra Taylor; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 6.  Update on Huntington's disease: advances in care and emerging therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel Zielonka; Michal Mielcarek; G Bernhard Landwehrmeyer
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 7.  A review of quality of life after predictive testing for and earlier identification of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Jane S Paulsen; Martha Nance; Ji-In Kim; Noelle E Carlozzi; Peter K Panegyres; Cheryl Erwin; Anita Goh; Elizabeth McCusker; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Where Do Patients Go for Information?

Authors:  Hank Schmidt; Almog Cohen; John Mandeli; Christina Weltz; Elisa R Port
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Developing a comprehensive, effective patient-friendly website to enhance decision making in predictive testing for Huntington disease.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins Virani; S M Creighton; M R Hayden
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington's disease: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Gerry Veenstra; Jan M Friedman; Susan Creighton; Lauren Currie; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigating the role of genetic counseling in neuromuscular disease considering life events.

Authors:  Yuka Shibata; Ichiro Yabe; Masaaki Matsushima; Naoki Hashimoto; Takahiro Yamada; Hidenao Sasaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Chris Jacobs; Toby Newton-John; Rosie O'Shea; Alison McEwen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Should we implement population screening for fragile X?

Authors:  David P Dimmock
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Predictive Genetic Counseling for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.159

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.