Literature DB >> 15940373

Examining bone surfaces across puberty: a 20-month pQCT trial.

Saija A Kontulainen1, Heather M Macdonald, Karim M Khan, Heather A McKay.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This follow-up study assessed sex differences in cortical bone growth at the tibial midshaft across puberty. In both sexes, periosteal apposition dominated over endosteal resorption. Boys had a greater magnitude of change at both surfaces, and thus, a greater increase in bone size across puberty. Relative increase in cortical bone area was similar between sexes.
INTRODUCTION: Generally, sex differences in bone size become most evident as puberty progresses. This was thought to be caused, in part, by greater periosteal apposition in boys, whereas endosteal apposition prevailed in girls. However, this premise is based on evidence from cross-sectional studies and planar measurement techniques. Thus, our aim was to prospectively evaluate sex-specific changes in cortical bone area across puberty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used pQCT to assess the tibial midshaft (50% site) at baseline and final (20 months) in girls (N = 68) and boys (N = 60) across early-, peri-, and postpuberty. We report total bone cross-sectional area (ToA, mm2), cortical area (CoA, mm2), marrow cavity area (CavA, mm2), and CoA/ToA ratio.
RESULTS: Children were a mean age of 11.9 +/- 0.6 (SD) years at baseline. At the tibia, CoA ranged from 230 +/- 44, 261 +/- 50, and 258 +/- 46 in early-, peri-, and postpubertal girls. In boys, comparable values were 223 +/- 36 (early), 264 +/- 38 (peri), and 281 +/- 77 (postpubertal). There was no sex difference for ToA or CoA at baseline. Increase in ToA and CoA was, on average, 10% greater for boys than girls across maturity groups. The area of the marrow cavity increased in all groups, but with considerable variability. The increase in CavA was significantly less for girls than boys in the early- and postpubertal groups. Change in CoA/ToA was similar between sexes across puberty.
CONCLUSION: Both sexes showed a similar pattern of change in CoA at the tibial midshaft, where periosteal apposition dominated over endosteal resorption. Boys showed a greater magnitude of change at both surfaces, and thus, showed a greater increase in bone size across puberty. The relative increase in cortical area was similar between sexes. These pQCT findings provide no evidence for endosteal apposition in postmenarchal girls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940373     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

1.  Are milk and alternatives and fruit and vegetable intakes during adolescence associated with cortical and trabecular bone structure, density, and strength in adulthood?

Authors:  E Z Movassagh; S Kontulainen; A D G Baxter-Jones; S Whiting; M Szafron; M Papadimitropoulos; H Vatanparast
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The role of lean body mass and physical activity in bone health in children.

Authors:  Fátima Baptista; Carlos Barrigas; Filomena Vieira; Helena Santa-Clara; Pedro Mil Homens; Isabel Fragoso; Pedro J Teixeira; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Sex Differences and Growth-Related Adaptations in Bone Microarchitecture, Geometry, Density, and Strength From Childhood to Early Adulthood: A Mixed Longitudinal HR-pQCT Study.

Authors:  Leigh Gabel; Heather M Macdonald; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Reexamining the Surfaces of Bone in Boys and Girls During Adolescent Growth: A 12-Year Mixed Longitudinal pQCT Study.

Authors:  Leigh Gabel; Lindsay Nettlefold; Penelope M Brasher; Sarah A Moore; Yasmin Ahamed; Heather M Macdonald; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Female reproductive system and bone.

Authors:  Bart L Clarke; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 7.  Skeletal geometry and indices of bone strength in artistic gymnasts.

Authors:  J N Dowthwaite; T A Scerpella
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  Effects of physical activity and muscle quality on bone development in girls.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Deepika R Laddu; Robert M Blew; Vinson R Lee; Scott B Going
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Exercise and Bone Macro-architecture: Is Childhood a Window of Opportunity for Osteoporosis Prevention?

Authors:  Scott B Going; Joshua N Farr
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2010-12

10.  Investigation of sex differences in hip structure in peripubertal children.

Authors:  Adrian Sayers; Michele Marcus; Carol Rubin; Michael A McGeehin; Jonathan H Tobias
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.