Joshua N Farr1, Deepika R Laddu, Robert M Blew, Vinson R Lee, Scott B Going. 1. 1College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 2Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and 3Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Poor muscle quality and sedentary behavior are risk factors for metabolic dysfunction in children and adolescents. However, because longitudinal data are scarce, relatively little is known about how changes in muscle quality and physical activity influence bone development. PURPOSE: In a 2-yr longitudinal study, we examined the effects of physical activity and changes in muscle quality on bone parameters in young girls. METHODS: The sample included 248 healthy girls age 9-12 yr at baseline. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to measure calf and thigh muscle density, an indicator of skeletal muscle fat content or muscle quality, as well as bone parameters at diaphyseal and metaphyseal sites of the femur and tibia. Physical activity was assessed using a validated questionnaire specific for youth. RESULTS: After controlling for covariates in multiple regression models, increased calf muscle density was independently associated with greater gains in cortical (β = 0.13, P < 0.01) and trabecular (β = 0.25, P < 0.001) volumetric bone mineral density and the bone strength index (β = 0.25, P < 0.001) of the tibia. Importantly, these relationships were generalized, as similar changes were present at the femur. Associations between physical activity and changes in bone parameters were weaker than those observed for muscle density. Nevertheless, physical activity was significantly (all P < 0.05) associated with greater gains in trabecular volumetric bone mineral density and the bone strength index of the distal femur. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that poor muscle quality may put girls at risk for suboptimal bone development. Physical activity is associated with more optimal gains in weight-bearing bone density and strength in girls, but to a lesser extent than changes in muscle quality.
INTRODUCTION: Poor muscle quality and sedentary behavior are risk factors for metabolic dysfunction in children and adolescents. However, because longitudinal data are scarce, relatively little is known about how changes in muscle quality and physical activity influence bone development. PURPOSE: In a 2-yr longitudinal study, we examined the effects of physical activity and changes in muscle quality on bone parameters in young girls. METHODS: The sample included 248 healthy girls age 9-12 yr at baseline. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to measure calf and thigh muscle density, an indicator of skeletal muscle fat content or muscle quality, as well as bone parameters at diaphyseal and metaphyseal sites of the femur and tibia. Physical activity was assessed using a validated questionnaire specific for youth. RESULTS: After controlling for covariates in multiple regression models, increased calf muscle density was independently associated with greater gains in cortical (β = 0.13, P < 0.01) and trabecular (β = 0.25, P < 0.001) volumetric bone mineral density and the bone strength index (β = 0.25, P < 0.001) of the tibia. Importantly, these relationships were generalized, as similar changes were present at the femur. Associations between physical activity and changes in bone parameters were weaker than those observed for muscle density. Nevertheless, physical activity was significantly (all P < 0.05) associated with greater gains in trabecular volumetric bone mineral density and the bone strength index of the distal femur. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that poor muscle quality may put girls at risk for suboptimal bone development. Physical activity is associated with more optimal gains in weight-bearing bone density and strength in girls, but to a lesser extent than changes in muscle quality.
Authors: Kristine M Shedd; Kathy B Hanson; D Lee Alekel; Daniel J Schiferl; Laura N Hanson; Marta D Van Loan Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Joshua N Farr; Janet L Funk; Zhao Chen; Jeffrey R Lisse; Robert M Blew; Vinson R Lee; Monica Laudermilk; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Bret H Goodpaster; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Elizabeth Stamm; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rachel J Wetzsteon; Moira A Petit; Heather M Macdonald; Julie M Hughes; Thomas J Beck; Heather A McKay Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Kenneth L Cameron; Kevin R Ford; Dustin R Grooms; Lindsey K Lepley; Gregory D Myer; Brian Pietrosimone Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: D R Laddu; J N Farr; V R Lee; R M Blew; C Stump; L Houtkooper; T G Lohman; S B Going Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: J B Koedijk; J van Rijswijk; W A Oranje; J P van den Bergh; S P Bours; H H Savelberg; N C Schaper Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Linda Berton; Giulia Bano; Sara Carraro; Nicola Veronese; Simona Pizzato; Francesco Bolzetta; Marina De Rui; Elena Valmorbida; Irene De Ronch; Egle Perissinotto; Alessandra Coin; Enzo Manzato; Giuseppe Sergi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240