Literature DB >> 15939584

A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction.

John Moult1.   

Abstract

For the past ten years, CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) has monitored the state of the art in modeling protein structure from sequence. During this period, there has been substantial progress in both comparative modeling of structure (using information from an evolutionarily related structural template) and template-free modeling. The quality of comparative models depends on the closeness of the evolutionary relationship on which they are based. Template-free modeling, although still very approximate, now produces topologically near correct models for some small proteins. Current major challenges are refining comparative models so that they match experimental accuracy, obtaining accurate sequence alignments for models based on remote evolutionary relationships, and extending template-free modeling methods so that they produce more accurate models, handle parts of comparative models not available from a template and deal with larger structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15939584     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  167 in total

1.  Planning combinatorial disulfide cross-links for protein fold determination.

Authors:  Fei Xiong; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Modeling large regions in proteins: applications to loops, termini, and folding.

Authors:  Aashish N Adhikari; Jian Peng; Michael Wilde; Jinbo Xu; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Template-based structure prediction and classification of transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Yuedong Yang; Bo Yao; Song Liu; Yaoqi Zhou; Chi Zhang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The SAMPL3 blind prediction challenge: transfer energy overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Molecular Simulations Find Stable Structures in Fragments of Protein G.

Authors:  Tjaša Urbič; Tomaž Urbič; Franc Avbelj; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Acta Chim Slov       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.735

7.  Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Tyler J Glembo; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A probabilistic and continuous model of protein conformational space for template-free modeling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 9.  Constraint methods that accelerate free-energy simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Evangelos A Coutsias; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.