Literature DB >> 1593918

The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.

A D Tussing1, M A Wojtowycz.   

Abstract

This study describes a research project involving economic and noneconomic aspects of the cesarean decision. The study was based on a 1986 data set dealing with 68,847 obstetric deliveries in New York State excluding New York City, and had the largest number of variables known to have been assembled to analyze the cesarean decision. The authors estimated a probit multiple regression in which the dependent variable was the method of delivery. The results diverge from widely held beliefs and research findings in some areas, and are of considerable interest in other areas. Contrary to other findings, the authors did not find a relationship between date of graduation from medical school and the probability of a cesarean section. More importantly, the authors failed to find much support for the idea that obstetricians perform cesareans to enrich themselves from the additional free income. However, our findings are consistent with the idea that obstetricians occasionally perform cesarean sections to manage their time, which does represent a form of economic self-interest. The study developed a proxy measure for fear of malpractice and found a negative relationship between fear of malpractice and cesarean section use. Finally, county cesarean rate and adjusted hospital cesarean section rate strongly and significantly influenced the probability that a given delivery is performed by cesarean section.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593918     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  14 in total

1.  The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.

Authors:  Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-09

2.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns.

Authors:  Gilbert W Gimm
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Adjusting cesarean delivery rates for case mix.

Authors:  E B Keeler; R E Park; R M Bell; D S Gifford; J Keesey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Do tort reforms impact the incidence of birth by cesarean section? A reassessment.

Authors:  Javier Cano-Urbina; Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Health maintenance organizations, independent practice associations, and cesarean section rates.

Authors:  A D Tussing; M A Wojtowycz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The effect of physician practice organization on efficient utilization of hospital resources.

Authors:  L R Burns; J A Chilingerian; D R Wholey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Terje P Hagen; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild; Irene Skau
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Pilfering for survival: how health workers use access to drugs as a coping strategy.

Authors:  Paulo Ferrinho; Maria Carolina Omar; Maria De Jesus Fernandes; Pierre Blaise; Ana Margarida Bugalho; Wim Van Lerberghe
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2004-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.