Literature DB >> 15937675

Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures.

R B Post1, H J E Keizer, V J M Leferink, C K van der Sluis.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to study the functional outcome after non-operative treatment of type A thoracolumbar spinal fractures without neurological deficit. Functional outcome was determined following the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, measuring restrictions in body function and structure, restrictions in activities, and restrictions in participation/quality of life. All patients were treated non-operatively for a type A thoracolumbar (Th11-L4) spinal fracture at the University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. Thirty-three of the eighty-one selected patients agreed to participate in the study (response-rate 41%). Respondents were older than non-respondents (mean 50.5 years vs. 39.2 years), but did not differ from each other concerning injury-related variables. Patients with a neurological deficit were excluded. Treatment consisted either of mobilisation without brace, or of bedrest followed by wearing a brace. Restrictions in body function and structure were measured by physical tests (dynamic lifting test and bicycle ergometry test); restrictions in activities were measured by means of questionnaires, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Visual Analogue Scale Spine Score (VAS). Restrictions in participation/quality of life were assessed with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and by means of return to work status. Thirty-seven per cent of the patients were not able to perform the dynamic lifting test within normal range. In the ergometry test, 40.9% of the patients performed below the lowest normal value, 36.4% of the patients achieved a high VO(2)-max. Mean RMDQ-score was 5.2, the mean VAS-score was 79. No significant differences between patients and healthy subjects were found in SF-36 scores, neither were differences found between braced and unbraced patients in any of the outcome measures. Concerning the return to work status, 10% of the subjects had stopped working and received social security benefits, 24% had arranged changes in their work and 14% had changed their job. We conclude that patients do reasonably well 5 years after non-operative treatment of a thoracolumbar fracture, although outcome is diverse in the different categories and physical functioning seems restricted in a considerable number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937675      PMCID: PMC3489326          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0887-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.

Authors:  J E Bickenbach; S Chatterji; E M Badley; T B Ustün
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery.

Authors:  M Grevitt; R Khazim; J Webb; R Mulholland; J Shepperd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

4.  Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. A standardized protocol and normative database.

Authors:  T G Mayer; D Barnes; N D Kishino; G Nichols; R J Gatchel; H Mayer; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization.

Authors:  G H Chow; B J Nelson; J S Gebhard; J L Brugman; C W Brown; D H Donaldson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Coulter; L Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

7.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

Authors:  T R Waters; V Putz-Anderson; A Garg; L J Fine
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

Authors:  W J Kraemer; E H Schemitsch; J Lever; R J McBroom; M D McKee; J P Waddell
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit.

Authors:  W J Shen; Y S Shen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Reduced pulmonary function in patients with spinal osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Schlaich; H W Minne; T Bruckner; G Wagner; H J Gebest; M Grunze; R Ziegler; G Leidig-Bruckner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.

Authors:  Byung-Guk Kim; Jin-Myoung Dan; Dong-Eun Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-02-13

3.  Long-term investigation of nonsurgical treatment for thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures: an outcome analysis in sight of spinopelvic balance.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Axel Hempfing; David Rohrmüller; Mark Tauber; Stefan Lederer; Herbert Resch; Juliane Zenner; Helmut Klampfer; Robert Schwaiger; Robert Bogner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A prospective cohort study comparing the VAS spine score and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire in patients with a type A traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fracture.

Authors:  J Siebenga; V J M Leferink; M J M Segers; M J Elzinga; F C Bakker; Duis Hj Ten; P M Rommens; P Patka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Non-operative vs. percutaneous stabilization in Magerl's A1 or A2 thoracolumbar spine fracture in adults: is it really advantageous for a good alignment of the spine? Preliminary data from a prospective study.

Authors:  Antonio Medici; Luigi Meccariello; Gabriele Falzarano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Aryan Behechtnejad; Alexander Ouchmaev; Matthias Morfeld; Karin Schermelleh-Engel; Michael Amling; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Functional and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures managed conservatively according to Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  Rajdeep Singh Bagga; Arvind B Goregaonkar; Aditya Anand Dahapute; Saurabh R Muni; Sandeep Gokhale; Jitesh Manghwani
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Nonoperatively treated type A spinal fractures: mid-term versus long-term functional outcome.

Authors:  R B Post; C K van der Sluis; V J M Leferink; P U Dijkstra; H J ten Duis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 10.  No evidence for the effectiveness of bracing in patients with thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Boukje M Giele; Suzanne H Wiertsema; Anita Beelen; Marike van der Schaaf; Cees Lucas; Henk D Been; Jos A M Bramer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.