Literature DB >> 15937619

Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery.

Matthias Kraemer1, Tengis Parulava, Michael Roblick, Lothar Duschka, Heinrich Müller-Lobeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been shown that for hemorrhoidal surgery both LigaSure and stapler cause less pain than diathermy or scissor dissection. This study has attempted to establish which of the less painful alternatives proves best in an unselected series of patients with hemorrhoidal disease.
METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized to undergo stapling hemorrhoidopexy or LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. Parameters investigated were pain (primary parameter), patient satisfaction with treatment, and recovery of personal activity. Other factors investigated were operative result, ease of handling, analgesic requirements, and postoperative course.
RESULTS: Both methods were found to be equivalent in all major aspects analyzed. Postoperative pain scores (P = 0.99), patient satisfaction (P = 1), and self-assessment of activity (P = 0.99) were almost identical in both groups of patients. Significant differences were found in none of the numerous factors investigated.
CONCLUSION: Both methods can be used safely and without major disadvantage for the patient regardless of stage and extent of hemorrhoidal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937619     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0067-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Anne Eberstein; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Volker Kahlke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Staple Line Polyposis and Cytomegalovirus Infection after Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed N Meshikhes; Hussain Issa
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-19

5.  Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M Fareed; Saleh El-Awady; H Abd-El monaem; A Aly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  J Castellví; A Sueiras; J Espinosa; J Vallet; V Gil; F Pi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids.

Authors:  K J Lumb; P H D Colquhoun; R A Malthaner; S Jayaraman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

8.  LigaSure Haemorrhoidectomy versus Conventional Diathermy for IV-Degree Haemorrhoids: Is It the Treatment of Choice? A Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentile; Michele De Rosa; Gabriele Carbone; Vincenzo Pilone; Francesca Mosella; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21

9.  Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  M Y Mastakov; P G Buettner; Y-H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.