Literature DB >> 15936569

The vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 shows increased antitumor efficacy and enhanced radiation response in large, advanced tumors.

Dietmar W Siemann1, Amyn M Rojiani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: ZD6126 is a vascular-targeting agent that induces selective effects on the morphology of proliferating and immature endothelial cells by disrupting the tubulin cytoskeleton. The efficacy of ZD6126 was investigated in large vs. small tumors in a variety of animal models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three rodent tumor models (KHT, SCCVII, RIF-1) and three human tumor xenografts (Caki-1, KSY-1, SKBR3) were used. Mice bearing leg tumors ranging in size from 0.1-2.0 g were injected intraperitoneally with a single 150 mg/kg dose of ZD6126. The response was assessed by morphologic and morphometric means as well as an in vivo to in vitro clonogenic cell survival assay. To examine the impact of tumor size on the extent of enhancement of radiation efficacy by ZD6126, KHT sarcomas of three different sizes were irradiated locally with a range of radiation doses, and cell survival was determined.
RESULTS: All rodent tumors and human tumor xenografts evaluated showed a strong correlation between increasing tumor size and treatment effect as determined by clonogenic cell survival. Detailed evaluation of KHT sarcomas treated with ZD6126 showed a reduction in patent tumor blood vessels that was approximately 20% in small (<0.3 g) vs. >90% in large (>1.0 g) tumors. Histologic assessment revealed that the extent of tumor necrosis after ZD6126 treatment, although minimal in small KHT sarcomas, became more extensive with increasing tumor size. Clonogenic cell survival after ZD6126 exposure showed a decrease in tumor surviving fraction from approximately 3 x 10(-1) to 1 x 10(-4) with increasing tumor size. When combined with radiotherapy, ZD6126 treatment resulted in little enhancement of the antitumor effect of radiation in small (<0.3 g) tumors but marked increases in cell kill in tumors larger than 1.0 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Because bulky neoplastic disease is typically the most difficult to manage, the present findings provide further support for the continued development of vascular disrupting agents such as ZD6126 as a vascular-targeted approach to cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936569     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Low Z target switching to increase tumor endothelial cell dose enhancement during gold nanoparticle-aided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ross I Berbeco; Alexandre Detappe; Panogiotis Tsiamas; David Parsons; Mammo Yewondwossen; James Robar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Support of a free radical mechanism for enhanced antitumor efficacy of the microtubule disruptor OXi4503.

Authors:  Lori Rice; Christine Pampo; Sharon Lepler; Amyn M Rojiani; Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.514

3.  Effects of exercise training on tumor hypoxia and vascular function in the rodent preclinical orthotopic prostate cancer model.

Authors:  Danielle J McCullough; Linda M-D Nguyen; Dietmar W Siemann; Bradley J Behnke
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 4.  The unique characteristics of tumor vasculature and preclinical evidence for its selective disruption by Tumor-Vascular Disrupting Agents.

Authors:  Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Dependency of the effect of a vascular disrupting agent on sensitivity to tirapazamine and gamma-ray irradiation upon the timing of its administration and tumor size, with reference to the effect on intratumor quiescent cells.

Authors:  Shin-ichiro Masunaga; Hideko Nagasawa; Kenji Nagata; Minoru Suzuki; Yoshihiro Uto; Hitoshi Hori; Yuko Kinashi; Koji Ono
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Monitoring antivascular therapy in head and neck cancer xenografts using contrast-enhanced MR and US imaging.

Authors:  Mukund Seshadri; Nuno T Sacadura; Tonya Coulthard
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 9.596

7.  Monitoring the treatment efficacy of the vascular disrupting agent CA4P.

Authors:  Beth A Salmon; Howard W Salmon; Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Modulation of in vivo tumor radiation response via gold nanoshell-mediated vascular-focused hyperthermia: characterizing an integrated antihypoxic and localized vascular disrupting targeting strategy.

Authors:  Parmeswaran Diagaradjane; Anil Shetty; James C Wang; Andrew M Elliott; Jon Schwartz; Shujun Shentu; Hee C Park; Amit Deorukhkar; R Jason Stafford; Sang H Cho; James W Tunnell; John D Hazle; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 9.  Modulating the tumor microenvironment to increase radiation responsiveness.

Authors:  Jayashree Karar; Amit Maity
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Nanoparticle Mediated Tumor Vascular Disruption: A Novel Strategy in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Sijumon Kunjachan; Alexandre Detappe; Rajiv Kumar; Thomas Ireland; Lisa Cameron; Douglas E Biancur; Vincent Motto-Ros; Lucie Sancey; Srinivas Sridhar; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Ross I Berbeco
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.189

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.