Literature DB >> 15936567

Use of principal component analysis to evaluate the partial organ tolerance of normal tissues to radiation.

Laura A Dawson1, Matthew Biersack, Gina Lockwood, Avraham Eisbruch, Theodore S Lawrence, Randall K Ten Haken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a novel method of analyzing partial volume effects of normal tissues to radiation. With this approach, principal component analysis (PCA) is used to efficiently describe the variance in cumulative dose-volume histogram (cDVH) morphology. The independent features of cDVHs that describe the largest variance are then investigated regarding complication risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Principal component analysis was used to describe the variance in the morphology of normal tissue cDVHs, irrespective of complication, by summarizing the largest source of variation within the first principal component (PC), the next largest in the second PC, and so on. Plots relating the most meaningful PCs were constructed. Ideally, cDVHs associated with a complication would yield PC values that could be easily segregated from cDVHs without a complication. Two data sets were evaluated with this approach: 90 parotid gland cDVHs (36 with complications) and 203 liver cDVHs (19 with complications).
RESULTS: Ninety-four percent and 80% of the variation in cDVH morphology was described with two PCs for the parotid gland and the liver data sets, respectively. Plots of the first and second PC values on a Cartesian plane for both data sets revealed "clusters." For the parotid gland, one cluster contained PCs from parotid gland cDVHs with complications, and the other primarily contained PCs from cDVHs without complications. The first PC value, corresponding to a larger volume treated with 10-60 Gy (2 Gy per fraction), was more likely to be larger in parotid gland cDVHs associated with complications than those without complications. In the plots of PC values of liver cDVHs, whole liver radiation cDVHs were segregated from the other cDVHs. There was a trend for cDVHs with a higher first PC, corresponding to increased volume treated with approximately 10-40 Gy (1.5 Gy b.i.d.), to be associated with increased risk of complication. For partial liver radiation cDVHs there was a trend for cDVHs with a higher first PC, corresponding to an increased volume treated with 5-50 Gy, to be associated with a complication. For each data set, logistic regression modeling revealed that the first PC was significantly associated with a complication developing (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Principal component analysis can be used to summarize the variance in parallel normal tissue cDVHs, and it can help segregate cDVHs at high or low risk for complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936567     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy; Avi Eisbruch; Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Randall K Ten Haken; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Radiation-associated liver injury.

Authors:  Charlie C Pan; Brian D Kavanagh; Laura A Dawson; X Allen Li; Shiva K Das; Moyed Miften; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Incidence of late rectal bleeding in high-dose conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose-based and dose-volume-based normal tissue complication probability models.

Authors:  Matthias Söhn; Di Yan; Jian Liang; Elisa Meldolesi; Carlos Vargas; Markus Alber
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Impact of bone marrow radiation dose on acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer: principal component analysis on high dimensional data.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Karen Messer; Brent S Rose; John H Lewis; Steve B Jiang; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Datamining approaches for modeling tumor control probability.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Joseph O Deasy; Yi Mu; Ellen Huang; Andrew J Hope; Patricia E Lindsay; Aditya Apte; James Alaly; Jeffrey D Bradley
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Bone marrow-derived stromal cell therapy in cirrhosis: clinical evidence, cellular mechanisms, and implications for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Rafi Kabarriti; Keyur J Mehta; Jayanta Roy-Chowdhury; Chandan Guha
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Predicting radiotherapy outcomes using statistical learning techniques.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Jeffrey D Bradley; Patricia E Lindsay; Andrew J Hope; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy.

Authors:  Yizheng Chen; Clemens Grassberger; Junli Li; Theodore S Hong; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Machine Learning and Imaging Informatics in Oncology.

Authors:  Huan-Hsin Tseng; Lise Wei; Sunan Cui; Yi Luo; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.