Literature DB >> 15936214

Development of goldfish macrophages in vitro.

Miodrag Belosevic1, Patrick C Hanington, Daniel R Barreda.   

Abstract

Over 100 years after the first description of macrophages by Metchnikoff, there are still questions as to the mechanisms leading to the heterogeneity of their lineage. Current views are based on the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) theory, where all mammalian macrophages are derived from circulating blood monocytes and ultimately from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow. Our studies on the regulation of fish macrophage development, suggested that teleosts have alternate pathways of monopoiesis, which undoubtedly contribute to macrophage heterogeneity in the goldfish. Macrophage heterogeneity has been attributed to a network of positive and negative regulators of macrophage development, including soluble mediators known as colony-stimulating factors of which two (M-CSF and GM-CSF) promote formation and growth of mature macrophages. In contrast to our knowledge of CSFs and their receptors in mammals, there is no published information about fish macrophage CSFs. Since fish macrophages generate their own growth factors, it is reasonable to assume that pathways of fish macrophage development and hematopoiesis may be distinct from those of mammalian macrophages. More importantly, the presence of fish progenitor/stem cells and developing macrophages in long-term cultures, allowed us to address pathways of macrophage differentiation, which could not be addressed in mammalian macrophage culture systems. Characterization of primary kidney macrophage (PKM) cultures from goldfish hematopoietic tissues (kidney) indicated that three distinct subpopulations developed in response to endogenous macrophage growth factors. These macrophage subpopulations expressed several differentiation markers, including the hematopoietic stem cell antigen AC133, c-kit, granulin, CD63, macrosialin, c/EBPbeta, legumain, and the colony-stimulating factor receptor-1 (CSF-1R). In the goldfish, there appeared to be a stringent control between those early progenitors that self-renewed, and those that were recruited into the maturation pathways. We report that upon commitment, goldfish macrophages developed through two distinct differentiation pathways: one consistent with the "classical" pathway (MPS) of macrophage development (progenitors-->monocytes-->mature macrophages), and an "alternate" pathway (AP-macrophages) where mature macrophages appeared to rapidly develop from early progenitors in the absence of an intermediate monocyte stage. AP-macrophages represent a unique subset of spontaneously growing cells. Their self-renewal was promoted by endogenous macrophage growth factors (MGF), and effectively controlled by a novel soluble form of the CSF-1R (sCSF-1R). The discovery of sCSF-1R in the goldfish highlights the inherent complexity in the hematopoietic regulatory machinery of teleosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15936214     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2004.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol        ISSN: 1050-4648            Impact factor:   4.581


  12 in total

1.  Differentiation-dependent antiviral capacities of amphibian (Xenopus laevis) macrophages.

Authors:  Amulya Yaparla; Milan Popovic; Leon Grayfer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Distinct functional roles of amphibian (Xenopus laevis) colony-stimulating factor-1- and interleukin-34-derived macrophages.

Authors:  Leon Grayfer; Jacques Robert
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.962

3.  Mechanisms of amphibian macrophage development: characterization of the Xenopus laevis colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor.

Authors:  Leon Grayfer; Eva-Stina Edholm; Jacques Robert
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.203

4.  Colony-stimulating factor-1-responsive macrophage precursors reside in the amphibian (Xenopus laevis) bone marrow rather than the hematopoietic subcapsular liver.

Authors:  Leon Grayfer; Jacques Robert
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.349

Review 5.  Amphibian macrophage development and antiviral defenses.

Authors:  Leon Grayfer; Jacques Robert
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Divergent antiviral roles of amphibian (Xenopus laevis) macrophages elicited by colony-stimulating factor-1 and interleukin-34.

Authors:  Leon Grayfer; Jacques Robert
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.962

7.  Haemopoiesis in the head kidney of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Teleostei: Cichlidae): a morphological (optical and ultrastructural) study.

Authors:  El-Saydah H Abdel-Aziz; Suzan B S Abdu; Tamer El-Sayed Ali; Huda F Fouad
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.794

8.  Myelopoiesis of the Amphibian Xenopus laevis Is Segregated to the Bone Marrow, Away From Their Hematopoietic Peripheral Liver.

Authors:  Amulya Yaparla; Phillip Reeves; Leon Grayfer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Studies on morphology and cytochemistry in blood cells of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis.

Authors:  Kojin Nakada; Kuniyasu Fujisawa; Hiroyuki Horiuchi; Shuichi Furusawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  Gene expression comparison of resistant and susceptible Atlantic salmon fry challenged with Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis virus reveals a marked contrast in immune response.

Authors:  Diego Robledo; John B Taggart; Jacqueline H Ireland; Brendan J McAndrew; William G Starkey; Chris S Haley; Alastair Hamilton; Derrick R Guy; Jose C Mota-Velasco; Almas A Gheyas; Alan E Tinch; David W Verner-Jeffreys; Richard K Paley; Georgina S E Rimmer; Ian J Tew; Stephen C Bishop; James E Bron; Ross D Houston
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.