Literature DB >> 15935238

Effectiveness and medical costs of divalproex versus lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder: results of a naturalistic clinical trial.

Dennis A Revicki1, Robert M A Hirschfeld, Eileen P Ahearn, Richard H Weisler, Cynthia Palmer, Paul E Keck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The clinical, quality of life (QOL), and medical cost outcomes of treatment with divalproex were compared with lithium in patients with bipolar I disorder over 1 year.
METHODS: In a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial, 201 adults hospitalized with bipolar I manic or mixed episodes were randomized to divalproex or lithium, in addition to usual psychiatric care, and followed for 1 year. All subsequent treatment of bipolar disorder was managed by the patient's psychiatrist. Symptoms of mania and depression were evaluated at baseline and at hospital discharge. Assessments at the start of maintenance therapy and after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months included manic and depressive symptoms, disability days and QOL. Medical resource use data were also collected monthly and costs were estimated using national sources.
RESULTS: Divalproex-treated patients (12%) were less likely to discontinue study medications for lack of efficacy or adverse effects than lithium-treated patients (23%). No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were observed over the 1-year maintenance phase for clinical symptoms, QOL outcomes, or disability days. Mean estimated total medical costs were USD 28,911 for the divalproex group compared with USD 30,666 for the lithium treatment group. Patients continuing mood stabilizer therapy at 3 months had slightly better health outcomes and substantially lower total medical costs than those who discontinued therapy ( USD 10,091 versus USD 34,432, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Divalproex maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder resulted in comparable medical costs, clinical and QOL outcomes compared with lithium. Patients remaining on mood stabilizer therapy had substantially lower total medical costs and better health outcomes compared with those who discontinued therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15935238     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  6 in total

Review 1.  Economics of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Julia M Dixon; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacological Interventions for People with Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Joran Lokkerbol
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Practical clinical trials in psychopharmacology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedetto Vitiello
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.153

4.  Pattern of healthcare resource utilization and direct costs associated with manic episodes in Spain.

Authors:  Monica Tafalla; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz; Teresa Diez; Luis Cordero
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 5.  Valproate for acute mania.

Authors:  Janina Jochim; Raphael P Rifkin-Zybutz; John Geddes; Andrea Cipriani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-07

6.  Comparative effectiveness of valproic acid in different serum concentrations for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: A retrospective cohort study using target trial emulation framework.

Authors:  Yang-Chieh Brian Chen; Chih-Sung Liang; Liang-Jen Wang; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Andre F Carvalho; Marco Solmi; Eduard Vieta; Ping-Tao Tseng; Pao-Yen Lin; Yu-Kang Tu; Chih-Wei Hsu; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.