Literature DB >> 16800717

Economics of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: a review of the literature.

Rachael L Fleurence1, Julia M Dixon, Dennis A Revicki.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations are increasingly being used by policy makers to evaluate the relative costs and benefits of healthcare interventions. These analyses provide economic and clinical evidence to decision makers seeking to make recommendations on treatment alternatives for patients. This article describes the economic evidence on the atypical antipsychotics currently approved for the treatment of bipolar disorder. This area remains under-researched. A literature search identified only six relevant studies of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: two retrospective database analyses, three economic analyses alongside clinical trials and one cost-effectiveness analysis. Based on the limited available studies, there appears to be no significant difference in healthcare resource use between olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and valproate semisodium (divalproex sodium; an antiepileptic drug and a standard treatment for mania associated with bipolar disorder). While a cost-effectiveness study for the UK found haloperidol (a conventional antipsychotic) to be more cost effective than atypical antipsychotics, these results must be considered with caution because of the non-inclusion of adverse effects in the model. No economic data are available for aripiprazole, clozapine or ziprasidone in bipolar disorder. Until more economic evidence becomes available, the economic implications of atypical antipsychotic treatment in patients with bipolar disorder are unlikely to significantly impact on prescribing and treatment patterns. Future economic studies evaluating atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder should address the issue of long-term costs and effectiveness to reflect the chronic nature of the disease, the variety of health states that patients may experience and the range of treatments they may receive. A better understanding of the complex interplay between effectiveness, safety, quality of life, adherence and resource use should ultimately contribute to improving the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16800717     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200620070-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  33 in total

1.  Atypical antipsychotics and the burden of disease.

Authors:  George M Simpson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Patient-based utilities for bipolar disorder-related health states.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Jennifer Hanlon; Silas Martin; Laszlo Gyulai; S Nassir Ghaemi; Frances Lynch; Sally Mannix; Leah Kleinman
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Effectiveness of aripiprazole v. haloperidol in acute bipolar mania: double-blind, randomised, comparative 12-week trial.

Authors:  Eduard Vieta; Michel Bourin; Raymond Sanchez; Ronald Marcus; Elyse Stock; Robert McQuade; William Carson; Neveen Abou-Gharbia; Rene Swanink; Taro Iwamoto
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Comparison of mental health resources used by patients with bipolar disorder treated with risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine.

Authors:  Frank Gianfrancesco; Jacqueline Pesa; Ruey-Hua Wang
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2005-04

5.  Efficacy of olanzapine in acute bipolar mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Olanzipine HGGW Study Group.

Authors:  M Tohen; T G Jacobs; S L Grundy; S L McElroy; M C Banov; P G Janicak; T Sanger; R Risser; F Zhang; V Toma; J Francis; G D Tollefson; A Breier
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09

6.  Lifetime rates of suicide attempts among subjects with bipolar and unipolar disorders relative to subjects with other Axis I disorders.

Authors:  Y W Chen; S C Dilsaver
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of acute mania. Olanzapine HGEH Study Group.

Authors:  M Tohen; T M Sanger; S L McElroy; G D Tollefson; K N Chengappa; D G Daniel; F Petty; F Centorrino; R Wang; S L Grundy; M G Greaney; T G Jacobs; S R David; V Toma
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Divalproex sodium versus olanzapine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar disorder: health-related quality of life and medical cost outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; L Clark Paramore; Kenneth W Sommerville; Alan C Swann; John M Zajecka
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 9.  Suicidal behaviour in bipolar disorder: risk and prevention.

Authors:  Leonardo Tondo; Göran Isacsson; Ross Baldessarini
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Pharmacotherapy for bipolar depression: an economic assessment.

Authors:  Charles L Bowden; Anupama A Krishnan
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.889

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Quetiapine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Ziprasidone for the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Lewis Warrington; Ilise Lombardo; Antony Loebel; Kathleen Ice
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Economic outcomes associated with atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Mary Lou Chatterton; Julia M Dixon; Kitty Rajagopalan
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.