Literature DB >> 1593418

Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers.

L Stinson1, W Ickes.   

Abstract

In unstructured interactions, male friends were found to be more accurate than male strangers in inferring each other's thoughts and feelings. Plausible reasons for this difference were that friends (a) interacted more and exchanged more information, (b) had more similar personalities and therefore more rapport with each other, and (c) had more detailed knowledge of each other's lives. Data confirmed that the friends did indeed interact more and were more similar in their sociability than the strangers; however, these differences did not account for the friends' greater empathic accuracy. Instead, this was primarily attributable to a difference in knowledge structures, namely, the friends' ability to accurately read their partners' thoughts and feelings about imagined events in another place or time.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593418     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.62.5.787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  13 in total

1.  Models of dyadic social interaction.

Authors:  Dale Griffin; Richard Gonzalez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Empathic accuracy in adults with a pervasive developmental disorder during an unstructured conversation with a typically developing stranger.

Authors:  Koen Ponnet; Ann Buysse; Herbert Roeyers; Kim De Corte
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2005-10

3.  Mind-reading in young adults with ASD: does structure matter?

Authors:  Koen Ponnet; Ann Buysse; Herbert Roeyers; Armand De Clercq
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-05

4.  Caring more and knowing more reduces age-related differences in emotion perception.

Authors:  Jennifer Tehan Stanley; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06

5.  How do I empathize with you? Let me count the ways: relations between facets of pain-related empathy.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Issner; Annmarie Cano; Michelle T Leonard; Amy M Williams
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Reactivity to fearful expressions of familiar and unfamiliar people in children with autism: an eye-tracking pupillometry study.

Authors:  Heather J Nuske; Giacomo Vivanti; Cheryl Dissanayake
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  The Things You Do: Internal Models of Others' Expected Behaviour Guide Action Observation.

Authors:  Kimberley C Schenke; Natalie A Wyer; Patric Bach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test.

Authors:  Jacob Israelashvili; Lisanne S Pauw; Disa A Sauter; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  Individualized Theory of Mind (iToM): When Memory Modulates Empathy.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Francesco Bernardi; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain.

Authors:  David Atkins; Ayse K Uskul; Nicholas R Cooper
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.