Literature DB >> 15933751

The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.

D G Day1, E D Sharpe, M J Atkinson, J A Stewart, W C Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance.
METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was administered the TSS-IOP survey.
RESULTS: Factors that correlated with patient satisfaction included perceived effectiveness of the medicine (F=7.47, P<0.001), ocular irritation (F=6.06, P<0.001), conjunctival hyperaemia (F=4.40, P<0.001), ease of use (F=8.52, P<0.001), and convenience of use (F=6.90, P<0.001). Patient compliance, acceptance of their illness, and knowledge of glaucoma were also related to perceived effectiveness of the medicine (P<0.001), ease of use (P<0.05) and convenience (P<0.001). Physician ratings of patient pressure control, side effects, and instillation problems also were significantly correlated to patient satisfaction (R=0.13-0.26, P=0.05-0.001). The physician ratings of patient compliance, however, were not significantly related to any dimension of patient satisfaction (P>0.05). Among monotherapy prostaglandin treatments, latanoprost demonstrated statistically greater satisfaction than bimatoprost or travoprost regarding conjunctival hyperaemia (P<0.05) and eye irritation (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence that patient satisfaction may be related to compliance, perceived effectiveness of treatment, adverse side effects, ease and convenience of use, acceptance of illness, and knowledge of glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15933751     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  21 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Quality of life in glaucoma patients after selective laser trabeculoplasty.

Authors:  Myrjam De Keyser; Maya De Belder; Veva De Groot
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  [Quantification of subjective visual quality of life in glaucoma patients : first results of a German version of the GQL-15 questionnaire].

Authors:  A Lappas; A M Foerster; A M Schild; A Rosentreter; T S Dietlein
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Can perforations of descemet's window (DW) improve the outcome of canaloplasty in open angle glaucoma?

Authors:  Barbara Pullig; Norbert Josef Koerber; Thomas Dietlein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Travoprost in the management of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Philippe Denis; David Covert; Anthony Realini
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03

6.  A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  David A Godfrey; Lee S Peplinski; Jeanette A Stewart; William C Stewart
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

7.  Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment.

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Muriel Viala-Danten; Hélène Gilet; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  An exploratory study of factors influencing glaucoma treatment adherence.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Stryker; Allen Dale Beck; Susan A Primo; Katharina V Echt; Lucja Bundy; Grace Cho Pretorius; Karen Glanz
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments.

Authors:  Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jennifer M Burr; Craig R Ramsay; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Maria Prior
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Brinzolamide-timolol suspension: acceptability and side effect profile.

Authors:  Md Doherty; Sg Fraser; Ps Phelan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.