Literature DB >> 15933476

Health economics: can we afford an unrestricted use of new biological agents in gastrointestinal oncology?

Carin A Uyl-de Groot1, Giuseppe Giaccone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review pharmacoeconomic studies in gastrointestinal oncology published after January 2003 and to assess whether the use of the new biologic agents should be restricted by cost considerations. RECENT
FINDINGS: Chemotherapy is standard treatment for the most common gastrointestinal tumors. New biologic agents have recently been introduced with significant benefit. Given the high cost of these novel agents, the question arises as to whether these drugs should be made available without restrictions. For some drugs, results from economic evaluations are available, showing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 33 649 and 46 720 Euros. However, for the most expensive new drugs such as bevacizumab and cetuximab no data is available yet. However, it is expected that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be much higher. In our opinion incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 45 000 Euros and 50 000 Euros per quality adjusted life year gained, should be acceptable for gastrointestinal cancer patients. We strongly recommend to authorities to be more willing to reimburse new cancer drugs for patients to benefit and that the pharmaceutical companies will be more prudent in their price setting.
SUMMARY: There are many new promising (biologic) agents available for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The availability of these drugs for patients becomes more and more dependent on economic reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933476     DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000168535.25330.6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol        ISSN: 1040-8746            Impact factor:   3.645


  4 in total

Review 1.  Medical paternalism and expensive unsubsidised drugs.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Julian Savulescu; Jacqui Thomson; Penelope Schofield; Linda Mileshkin; Emilia Agalianos; John Zalcberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-05

2.  Survival and death signals can predict tumor response to therapy after oncogene inactivation.

Authors:  Phuoc T Tran; Pavan K Bendapudi; H Jill Lin; Peter Choi; Shan Koh; Joy Chen; George Horng; Nicholas P Hughes; Lawrence H Schwartz; Vincent A Miller; Toshiyuki Kawashima; Toshio Kitamura; David Paik; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Capecitabine, alone and in combination, in the management of patients with colorectal cancer: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Pasquale Comella; Rossana Casaretti; Claudia Sandomenico; Antonio Avallone; Luca Franco
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Cost-effectiveness of hypothetical new cancer drugs in patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer: results of a markov chain model.

Authors:  Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Joseph McDonnell; Guul Ten Velde; David Radice; Harry J M Groen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.